Gospel of Matthew Chapter 22 -- John Karmelich
1.
My
title for Chapter 22 is, “the silence is deafening”.
a)
That’s
an old cliché that means the lack of a verbal response by a person or a group
can say as much as if the person did verbally respond.
b)
In
Chapter 22 we have 5 stories. All five
end with a “very loud silence” from the crowd.
i)
The
first is Jesus telling a parable about a wedding feast.
a)
The
purpose is to tell who is and who is not coming to heaven.
b)
The
purpose was to put-down the religious Jews and to show their lack of faith in
Jesus will cost them their eternal salvation.
c)
What
is noticeable about this parable is a lack of response by the Pharisees.
d)
At
the end “their silence is deafening”.
ii)
The
next story is Jesus answering the question, “Is it lawful to pay taxes to
Caesar?
a)
The
Pharisees sent their disciples to try to trap Jesus into taking sides on a
controversial debate.
b)
When
Jesus gave his answer, again “their silence is deafening”.
(1)
The
text has a very “loud” lack of a response to Jesus’ answer.
c)
The
Pharisees’ disciples didn’t comment any further after Jesus’ answer.
iii)
The
next story is about the Sadducees asking about the resurrection.
a)
The
Sadducees were a Jewish “denomination” that didn’t believe in the concept of
the resurrection.
b)
They
were attempting to trap Jesus with their question.
c)
Again,
when Jesus gave his answer, again “their silence is deafening”.
iv)
The
next story is some Pharisees asking, “which is the greatest commandment?”
a)
This
may have been another attempt to trick Jesus as the Pharisees debated among
themselves which is the greatest of all the bible commandments.
b)
Again,
the text has a very loud lack of response to Jesus’ answer.
v)
The
final story is Jesus asking the Pharisees about just who is the Messiah.
a)
Let’s
look at the last verse of this chapter, Verse 46:
b)
“No
one could say a word in reply, and from that day on no one dared to ask him any
more questions.”
c)
One
can see, in summary why I call this chapter, “The silence is deafening”.
i)
In
every case, you can see how Jesus is the final authority in a debate.
2.
There
are other lessons for us to pick up as well in this chapter:
a)
One
cannot “out debate Jesus”, or the word of God for that matter in proving Jesus
is the promised Messiah.
i)
The
mistake we make is we try to use our own wits to defend Christianity as opposed
to the bible itself. The internal
evidence from the bible is enough to support Jesus as the Messiah. We don’t have to add anything to that.
ii)
The
reason people refuse to believe is because it means changing their lifestyle,
and that is what they refuse to do.
b)
Notice
also when the crowd tries to pin Jesus in a debate question, Jesus “rises
above” the debate itself and points out the underlying cause of the
debate. We’ll cover that more through
the chapter.
c)
The
first story in particular has more great lessons on just what is required for
salvation.
i)
We’ll
take that one on more in a page or two.
d)
Several
of these stories also give us a few clues as to what life in heaven is like.
i)
The
first parable about the wedding banquet teaches us who is invited to heaven.
ii)
The
third story talks about lack-of-marriage in heaven and how we are “like
angels”. We will discuss that point
when we get there.
3.
Chapter
22, Verse 1: Jesus spoke to them again in
parables, saying:
a)
Chapter
22 opens with a parable.
i)
In
the last part of Chapter 21, Jesus was addressing some Pharisees in the crowd
along with his disciples.
ii)
Chapter
21, verses 28-46 had two parables:
a)
The
parable of the two sons (one did what father wanted, other did not).
b)
The
parable of vineyard tenants who killed the vineyard owner’s son when that son
came to collect the rent.
iii)
Chapter
22 now opens with the 3rd parable in this trilogy.
iv)
In
the first 2 parables, Jesus commented after each one how they are illustrations
about salvation. Jesus was specifically
addressing the Pharisees in the crowd who were trusting in their own religious
works as opposed to their belief in Jesus.
v)
In
this parable, you will notice there is no follow-up comment by Jesus,
nor by the Pharisees. It gets back to
my “silence is deafening” comments.
b)
Let’s
summarize the parable before I dissect it and analyze it to death. J
i)
The
story is about a king who prepares a banquet for his son’s wedding.
ii)
The
king sends invitations to lots of people.
iii)
All
those people make excuses and refuse to come.
iv)
When
the king sends more messengers, those invitee’s kill the messengers.
v)
The
king then kills the invitee’s.
vi)
The
king, who wants people at the celebration, then gives the orders to invite
anyone else willing to come. The
newcomers then come to the wedding.
(Gee, after watching the first group get killed, I’d be there real quick. J)
vii)
Finally,
there is the story-within-the-story of one of the guests who wasn’t wearing “a
wedding gown”. This person gets thrown
out of the wedding banquet.
Jesus then compares that person to one who is going to hell.
4.
Verse
2: "The kingdom of heaven is like a king who
prepared a wedding banquet for his son.
a)
The
term “kingdom of heaven” has several meanings in the bible.
i)
It
can refer to those who are saved, here on earth.
ii)
It
can also refer to our next life in heaven.
iii)
Either
way, it is about the same group of people.
b)
Near
the end of the book of Revelation, there is the fact that there is going
to be a wedding banquet for Jesus. We,
as believers in the church, are the “bride” of Christ.
i)
“Let
us rejoice and be glad and give him glory! For the wedding of the Lamb (Jesus)
has come, and his bride (us) has made herself ready.” (Rev. 19:7, NIV)
ii)
“Then
the angel said to me, “Write: ‘Blessed are those who are invited to the wedding
supper of the Lamb!”” (Rev. 19:9a, NIV)
iii)
My
point is that this parable, here in Matthew, is about eternal salvation
and the plans for us in heaven.
c)
Religious
Jews also understood that that the Jewish nation is referred to in the Old
Testament as the “God’s bride” in the sense that even though they have been
unfaithful many times, God is committed to Israel despite of her faults.
i)
The
book of Hosea teaches on the illustration how God loves Israel “like a bride”.
ii)
“The
LORD said to me (Hosea), “Go, show your love to your wife again, though she is
loved by another and is an adulteress. Love her as the LORD loves the
Israelites, though they turn to other gods and love the sacred raisin cakes
(the raisin cakes refers to other gods).”
(Hosea 3:1, NIV)
iii)
This
is another reason why I take the view that God’s commitment to the nation
of Israel is unconditional. Most Jews
of that day did not see salvation as they refused to accept Jesus. There will come a day where God once again
will turn his focus back on Israel due to that unconditional relationship with
the nation.
5.
Verse
3: He sent his servants to those who had been invited
to the banquet to tell them to come, but they refused to come.
a)
A
custom of that time for a king’s banquet is to have a “double-invitation”.
i)
First,
the invitations are sent saying the king is going to have a banquet and give the
rough time (as opposed to exact time) of the banquet.
ii)
Next,
comes the “second invitation” when the wedding announcers say, “Come on
everyone, now is the time.
b)
The
last phrase of Verse 3 is one of the saddest in the chapter: “but they refused to come.”
i)
It
is hard for me to imagine anyone not wanting to go to a king’s banquet.
ii)
Imagine
an American president who you really hated.
a)
You
turn down an invitation to his party, because you can’t stand the king.
iii)
The
point is Jesus is “the king’s son”, and even though Jesus is legitimately the
king’s son, the resentment by Pharisees of that fact means they wouldn’t come.
6.
Verse
4: "Then he sent some more
servants and said, `Tell those who have been invited that I have prepared my
dinner: My oxen and fattened cattle have been butchered, and everything is
ready. Come to the wedding banquet.'
a)
These
two verses show the patience of God.
i)
In
the story, we have the king saying in effect, “Well, maybe they won’t come
because my messengers said something to offend them. Just to make sure, I’ll send some more messengers and tell them
the food is all ready.”
ii)
God
knows all things. God knows in people’s
hearts that they refused the initiation.
But out of God’s love, he is pleading with those who were invited
to please come. God understands the
consequences of eternal hell better than those who were invited.
b)
This
parable refers to the Nation of Israel.
i)
One
has to remember that because God “picked” the Nation of Israel to bring the
Messiah into the world, they get the first invitation to the “wedding banquet”.
a)
Paul
said, “I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the
salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then
for the Gentile.” (Romans 1:16, NIV)
ii)
What
if the Jewish nation accepted Jesus?
a)
Would
Jesus then set up his eternal kingdom at that point?
b)
We
don’t know the answer. We do know that
God knows all things in advance, and knew they would reject Jesus. That was part of God’s “overall plan” to
have people of all races as believers in Christ.
7.
Verse
5: "But they paid no attention and went off--one
to his field, another to his business.
a)
The
people invited to wedding were more interested in “their business” than the
kings.
b)
Nothing
has changed much today. People are more
interested in “making a buck” than going to church. Look today at the majority of the world (or a majority of
Americans) who refuse to accept Jesus because they are “too busy going about
their own business”.
8.
Verse
6: The rest seized his servants,
mistreated them and killed them.
a)
I
take the view the largest number of people in hell will be those who simply
“ignored” Jesus and tried to be neutral.
Those are the people in Verse 5.
b)
Verse
6 represents another group: Those who
actively opposed the Gospel message.
i)
The
group in Verse 5 “paid no attention.”
The group in Verse 6 “killed them.”
ii)
The
majority of non-believers don’t make a big deal about it. They make statements like, “Well, your
religion is good for you, but I have my own views” or something to that
nature. Verse 6 is the vocal-atheist or
the zealous cult-member that does his utmost to tell people that Jesus is not
God.
c)
Verse
6 also represents those who don’t want to hear the Gospel message.
i)
They
don’t want anyone to convict them of their sins, so they “kill the messenger”.
9.
Verse
7: The king was enraged. He sent his
army and destroyed those murderers and burned their city.
a)
Well,
that’s not good. J
b)
This
verse implies that non-believers only get “so many chances” and that’s it.
i)
How
many “chances” they get is God’s decision and not ours.
ii)
Our
job is to be a witness to them and pray for them.
c)
Remember
that the people who refused to come were busy “doing their business”.
i)
Here
in Verse 7, the king burned their city.
ii)
Stop
and think of all the effort people do to “have more stuff”. They work so hard as to ignore God to get
more stuff. Now the king is “burning
their stuff”. This verse is another
reminder of how futile material items are in comparison to a relationship with
God.
a)
I’m
not saying we have to take a vow of poverty.
We just have to have the proper perspective of life on this earth as
compared to eternal rewards.
10.
Verse
8: "Then he said to his servants,
`The wedding banquet is ready, but those I invited did not deserve to come. 9 Go to the street corners
and invite to the banquet anyone you find.' 10 So the servants went out into the streets and
gathered all the people they could find, both good and bad, and the wedding
hall was filled with guests.
a)
Notice
in Verse 8 it says, “those I invited did not deserve to come.”
i)
Jesus
was speaking to people who spent their life studying the Old Testament.
ii)
They
did their best to obey the laws of God the best they could.
iii)
Yet,
the message is they don’t’ deserve to come.
iv)
That’s
the Gospel message. Your entrance into
heaven is not based on how good you are, but on the question, “What have you
done with my son Jesus?”
b)
Verses
9-10 say in effect, “I’m the king and I’m having a party and a party needs
guests. Go get anybody who’s willing to
come. I don’t care what they are like
as long as they are willing to come (notice the phrase “good and bad” in verse
10).
i)
Remember
that Matthew wrote this to a Jewish audience.
ii)
Their
view of heaven is that it is only for Jews or Jewish converts. Further, it is only for those Jews who obey
God’s commandments.
iii)
For
Jesus to imply that “anyone” could come to heaven simply by accepting the kings
(God’s ) invitation is a difficult concept to accept.
iv)
Personally,
I picture Matthew smiling as he wrote this quote. Remember that Matthew was Jewish, but was also a tax
collector. He was despised as a traitor
for his past life. He is getting
reassured that despite his past, he is getting acceptance.
11.
Verse
11: "But when the king came in to see the guests,
he noticed a man there who was not wearing wedding clothes. 12 `Friend,' he asked, `how
did you get in here without wedding clothes?' The man was speechless.
a)
First
of all, this is not a fashion comment.
Jesus is not saying you don’t make it into the heaven based on your
choice in clothing. (“I’m sorry, that
belt does not go with those shoes. You
can’t come in here.” J)
b)
A
wedding banquet of that time, especially one given by the king, required
special wedding clothes. There is a
garment-at-the-door waiting for you as you come in.
c)
For
someone to not where that garment, you are making the statement, “I’m
here, but I don’t want to be here.”
Another statement is, “Yes I’m here to check it out, but I don’t like
the king, nor his son, so I’m not wearing the garment out of protest”.
d)
A
few verses back, we had those who refuse to come be killed. So in this parable, who does this
not-dressed-properly person represent?
i)
Most
commentators argue that it represents false believers within the church. It represents those who come to church but
don’t really have a heart for Jesus.
ii)
It
can refer to cult members, or false-teachers or simply anyone claiming to be a
Christian, but denying the fundamental facts about God the Father and Jesus.
iii)
In
this parable, the person is “kicked out” of the wedding.
iv)
Some
people compare this to the church “kicking out” non-believers.
v)
Other
commentators compare this to God refusing to let someone in heaven just because
he was “religious”.
vi)
Either
way, we are still discussing non-believers.
e)
Going
back to my opening theme, notice that when this not-dressed-properly person is
questioned about it, “He is silent”.
i)
When
we approach God for the wrong reasons (i.e., trying to please him on our own
efforts, there is nothing we can say in our defense.
ii)
God
is perfect by definition. A perfect God
requires us to be perfect to spend eternity with Him. We become “perfect” by accepting Jesus as a
perfect substitution on our behalf. To
come to God any other way is to show our lack of perfection. Non-believers who are aware of Jesus will
have no excuse for eternity.
a)
Paul
said, “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his
eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from
what has been made, so that men are without excuse.”
(Romans 1:20, NIV)
12.
Verse
13: "Then the king told the
attendants, `Tie him hand and foot, and throw him outside, into the darkness,
where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.'
a)
The
term “weeping and gnashing of teeth” has already been used three times by Jesus
previously in the Gospel of Matthew (ref.:
8:12, 13:42 and 13:50).
i)
In
each of those previous cases, Jesus was talking about eternal hell.
ii)
My
personal view of eternal hell is not a fire pit, but complete darkness. Imagine being deep in a large cave with no
light. I think that eternal separation
from God is what causes the weeping and the gnashing of teeth in pain.
13.
Verse
14: "For many are invited, but few
are chosen."
a)
If
you want a good balance between “pre-destiny and “free-will” there it is in
Verse 14.
b)
God
gives us the free will to choose to be with him for eternity.
i)
That
is the “many are invited” aspect.
ii)
Our
salvation requires us, in our free will to choose to accept God’s free gift of
salvation through Jesus.
c)
God
is perfect. A perfect God cannot learn
anything or he wouldn’t be perfect. If
he cannot learn, he must know all things.
Therefore, God knows in advance who will choose to accept Jesus as their
Savior. In that sense, all Christians
are “chosen” by God. That is the
“pre-destiny” aspect of Christianity.
d)
There
is an expression I always liked that applies here: “The river of truth runs between the banks of the two extremes”.
i)
There
are some who are obsessed with the free-will aspect of Christianity.
ii)
There
are some who are obsessed with the pre-destiny aspect of Christianity.
iii)
Christianity
requires both aspects, even though it is difficult to reconcile.
14.
Verse
15: Then the Pharisees went out and laid plans to trap
him in his words. 16
They sent their disciples to him along with the Herodians. (I’m stopping in the middle of Verse 16).
a)
Notice
the Pharisees didn’t go themselves.
They sent their own disciples.
i)
By
this time, Jesus would recognize their faces.
In order to trap Jesus, they had to send others Jesus would not
recognize.
b)
History
is a little vague on who are the “Herodians”.
i)
They
were probably Jewish people who were pro-Roman Empire.
ii)
Remember
King Herod ruled over this territory, thus the name “Herodians”.
iii)
Also
remember that King Herod had John the Baptist killed. Herod’s territory did include the Galilee region, but not
Jerusalem. That was Pilate’s territory.
c)
The
Pharisees hated Rome and wanted Israel’s independence. They hated Jesus so much they were willing
to work with political enemies (The Herodians) in order to trap them.
i)
Yassar
Arafat is famous for the quote, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”. It is amazing to think what people will do
out of their hatred of Jesus.
15.
Verse
16b: "Teacher," they said, "we know
you are a man of integrity and that you teach the way of God in accordance with
the truth. You aren't swayed by men, because you pay no attention to who they
are. 17 Tell us then, what is your
opinion? Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not?"
a)
Notice
how these guys tried “buttering up” Jesus before asking the question.
i)
It
is a quick reminder to us to not be so trusting to strangers who compliment us.
b)
The
Pharisees thought they got Jesus in a trap.
i)
If
Jesus says he is in favor of paying the taxes to Caesar (i.e., Roman Empire)
than he would be against the Jewish independence.
ii)
If
Jesus says he is against paying the tax, the Pharisees could turn Jesus over to
the Romans for being a traitor and someone wanting to overthrow Rome.
c)
They
asked this question in front of Jesus’ followers in order for him to answer
publicly.
16.
Verse
18: But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said,
"You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me? 19 Show me the coin used for
paying the tax." They brought him a denarius, 20 and he asked them,
"Whose portrait is this? And whose inscription?"
"Caesar's," they replied. Then he said to them, "Give to Caesar
what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's."
a)
First
of all, Jesus knew that their compliments were insincere and that they were
trying to trap him. Jesus knew that
they weren’t sincerely interested in His opinion, which is why Jesus called
them hypocrites.
b)
It
is only after pointing out their sin that Jesus dealt with the question
itself.
c)
Jesus
gave the answer “Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's.”
i)
Jesus
is not giving a down-the-middle or make-both-sides-happy response.
ii)
Jesus
is saying in effect, “I’m not here to overthrow Rome. Yes you the Jews were conquered by Rome. God allowed Rome to rise as a great power
and to conquer you for greater purposes than you can comprehend right now. (The spread of Christianity is much easier
under one empire and one set of rules!)
Because Rome is over you, you must pay tribute to Rome through
their tax and give to God of what God asks you to give.
iii)
Modern
translation: Pay your taxes and
obey God’s commandments.
a)
There
are Christians who don’t want to pay taxes or part of them because the taxes go
to immoral causes. There are things
like government-paid-for abortions that I consider abominable. Jesus principal is in effect, “whether you
like it or not, this government is over you and you must pay for its service
whether you like it or not”.
iv)
All
authority is God-ordained. This is why
we pray for our political leaders.
a)
“Everyone
must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority
except that which God has established.”
(Romans 13:1a, NIV).
b)
“(Pray)
for kings and all those in authority, that we may live peaceful and quiet lives
in all godliness and holiness. (1st
Timothy 2:2, NIV).
17.
Verse
22: When they
heard this, they were amazed. So they left him and went away.
a)
My
theme of “The silence is deafening” really applies here.
i)
The
silence of those asking the questions shows their defeat in their purpose.
ii)
You
can’t “out-debate” Jesus. He is
the final authority in all things.
18.
Verse
23: That same day the Sadducees, who
say there is no resurrection, came to him with a question. 24 "Teacher," they
said, "Moses told us that if a man dies without having children, his
brother must marry the widow and have children for him. 25 Now there were seven
brothers among us. The first one married and died, and since he had no
children, he left his wife to his brother. 26 The same thing happened to the second and third
brother, right on down to the seventh. 27 Finally, the woman died. 28 Now then, at the
resurrection, whose wife will she be of the seven, since all of them were
married to her?"
a)
When
one group couldn’t debate Jesus anymore, another one gives it a shot.
b)
The
last group was the religious-conservatives.
Now comes the religious liberals.
i)
The
first group, the Pharisees were the bible-literalists.
ii)
This
group, the Sadducees, were the “bible is all symbolic and not literal” types.
iii)
The
Sadducees believed the first five books of God (The “Torah” in Hebrew) were
God-inspired as good-moral stories, but they didn’t believe the other Old
Testament books were God inspired.
iv)
When
Jesus rebukes these guys, Jesus sticks only to the “Torah” to rebuke
them.
c)
In
this paragraph the Sadducees were making fun of the idea of the resurrection.
i)
The
Sadducees didn’t believe in the concept of the resurrection.
ii)
Therefore,
they made up this story of “seven grooms for one bride” in order to trap Jesus
on the concept of marriage and resurrection.
iii)
The
Sadducees were correct in that it is a biblical idea of when a man dies without
children, his brother is supposed to take the women and have children in his
brother’s name. It is not a binding
requirement, but if the surviving brother won’t do it, he is to be publicly put
to shame. (Reference: Deuteronomy
25:5-10).
d)
God
says when two people become married, “they become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24).
i)
Therefore,
the Sadducees thought they had Jesus in a “conflict” because they assumed that
marriage would continue into the next life (which they didn’t believe in, but
their rivals, the Pharisees did) and the “7 grooms/1 bride” problem.
19.
Verse
29: Jesus
replied, "You are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the
power of God. 30 At the resurrection people
will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in
heaven. 31 But about the resurrection
of the dead--have you not read what God said to you, 32 `I am the God of Abraham,
the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'? He is not the God of the dead but of
the living."
a)
First,
let’s understand just how Jesus rebuked their arguments:
i)
The
key word is in Verse 32 is the word “am”.
ii)
Jesus
quotes, “I am the God of Abraham the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'”
a)
This
is a correct quote of Genesis 3:6.
iii)
It
is, “I am the God of Abraham…” as opposed to “I was the God of
Abraham...”
iv)
If
Abraham were dead (not resurrected), the quote would be I was the God…”
v)
Since
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are resurrected, the correct quote is “am
the God”.
b)
In
Verse 29, Jesus said the Sadducees were in error for 2 things:
i)
The
first was for not knowing their Scriptures.
a)
The
mistake of the Sadducees was not taking the scriptures seriously.
b)
There
are many people who look at the bible as a bunch of good moral stories, but
then don’t take them as factual and don’t take them seriously.
c)
There
are parts that are poetic, but most of the bible is to be taken literally.
d)
The
basic rule of Scripture interpretation is “if the plain sense makes perfect
sense, seek no other sense”. If God
says he is the God of Abraham (as opposed to “was”), then Abraham is
still alive in heaven.
e)
I
find it interesting that when you read through the New Testament, you do read
of Pharisees who became Christians, but you never read of any Sadducees who
became Christians.
(1)
I
am convinced it is easier to teach someone about Jesus who takes his or her
bible seriously than one who allegorizes the book.
ii)
The
second mistake the Sadducees make is not knowing the power of God.
(1)
The
opening verse of the bible is, “In the beginning God created the heavens and
the earth.” (Genesis 1:1, NIV)
(2)
If
you can “handle” that verse, you can handle the rest of the bible.
(3)
For
example, a God who is capable of creating the heaven and earth is a God that is
capable of hearing billions of prayers at once.
(a)
A
God who is capable of creating the heaven and earth is a God that can bring the
dead back to life.
(b)
A
God who is capable of creating the heaven and earth can resolve any
problem you bring to Him if he so chooses.
c)
Now
let’s talk a little about life-in-heaven.
i)
We
get a few clues about the next life from these scriptures.
ii)
The
first is that “people will neither marry nor be given in marriage.”
a)
Does
this mean we will have no sex drive, or just no marriage?
(1)
We
don’t have an answer, just a question on that one!
b)
The
reason there is no marriage is that, in a sense, we are all “the bride of
Christ”. We talked about that concept a
few pages back. Our focus in heaven
will be upon our relationship with God the Father and our relationship with
Jesus.
(1)
Marriage
to anyone else but Jesus is no longer necessary.
c)
A
lot of people worry and wonder about this.
Many people have had wonderful terrific marriages and want to spend
eternity with their spouses.
d)
First
of all, I believe we are going to have such joy, such peace in heaven for
eternity, that we can focus more on God and not our spouses.
(1)
If
this issue is difficult for you, study the last two chapters of the Revelation. It is mostly about our next life. The emphasis is on God’s new relationship
with people and vice-versa.
e)
The
Mormons interpret this verse as, “you are married for eternity”. They read this verse and say in effect,
“Whoever you marry here you are married to for eternity as there is no marriage
in heaven”.
(1)
This
is bad interpretation of this verse. I
believe Jesus’ point is that our relationship in heaven focus on God and man
and therefore, male-female marriage isn’t necessary. It is not about eternally bound to your spouse.
f)
If
you read through the entire bible, we don’t have a lot of information about the
next life. The bible spends most of the
time dealing with our lives here on earth.
(1)
I
interpret that fact this way, “Here are your instructions (the bible) for life
here on earth. Keep your focus on the
rewards of heaven, but don’t worry about the details. I, God will take care of that, and it will be wonderful. You (us) focus on what I called you to do
here and now in this lifetime.”
(2)
I
heard a great comment to the effect of, “God spent 6 days creating the heaven
and earth. Jesus has been gone for
2,000 years and said he “went to go prepare a place for us” (John 14:2). If Jesus is taking that long to make us a
“place” it must be something special.
d)
One
last thing on this topic. The bible
clearly teaches that Jesus is the “first to rise from the dead”. This is what is meant by the bible-term
“firstfruits”.
i)
“But
Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have
fallen asleep.” (1st
Corinthians 15:20, NIV)
ii)
Critics
will say, “If God “is” the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, how could Jesus be
the “first” to be in heaven?”
a)
Jesus
himself tells the answer in Luke 16:19-31.
b)
This
is the account of a poor man named Lazarus who is “comforted in the bosom of
Abraham.
c)
The
same story mentions another man who is tormented. There is a “great chasm” (Verse 26) between Lazarus and the
tormented man.
d)
Some
people think this is a parable (a fictional story). It is not a fictional story because in all the other
parables given by Jesus, there are no actual names given. In this factual account, the names of people
are given.
e)
A
point of this story is that there is a “temporary holding place” for those who
were saved, prior to Jesus being resurrected.
Those same people are now in heaven.
20.
Verse
33: When the crowds heard this, they were astonished at
his teaching.
a)
Again,
“the silence is deafening in the crowd.”
i)
Jesus
just silenced the Sadducees, as stated in Verse 34.
ii)
Jesus
just taught the importance of taking your Scriptures seriously and how the
bible does teach about the resurrection.
b)
The
“crowd” was astonished at this teaching.
i)
I’m
sure there were many in the crowd who heard the Sadducees teaching and the
Pharisees teaching and were not sure who was right.
ii)
Jesus,
putting the Sadducees “in their place” with this rebuttal, gave the crowd
something to think about.
iii)
The
Pharisees will get their condemnation.
We will discuss that in Chapter 23
21.
Verse
34: Hearing that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, the
Pharisees got together. 35
One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: 36 "Teacher, which is the
greatest commandment in the Law?"
a)
The
put-down of the Sadducees gave their rivals, the Pharisees “a second wind”.
b)
The
Pharisees thought (wrongly) “Maybe he is one of us, let’s ask him more
questions”.
c)
Reading
these verses, one cannot tell if they were asking Jesus this question out of
genuine curiosity or if were they trying to trap him.
i)
The
Pharisees were either interested at what Jesus really thought was the greatest
commandment or they were trying to get him to take a side in a debate.
ii)
If
one reads through the five books of Moses there are actually hundreds of
commandments that Moses gives to the Israelites. The “10 commandments” are something special in that God
“hand-wrote” those on stone tablets for everyone to see. The 10 commandments are often considered a
summary of all the commandments in those books.
a)
Orthodox
Judaism teaches that there are 613 commandments in those five books. Who am I to argue with that? J
iii)
So
here are some Pharisees asking Jesus in effect, “Of the 613, which is #1?”
iv)
Jesus
response is Verse 37.
22.
Verse
37: Jesus
replied: " `Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your
soul and with all your mind.' 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it:
`Love your neighbor as yourself.' 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two
commandments."
a)
If
you take all 613 commandments, or even just the 10 commandments, you can
categorize them into two groups:
i)
Our
relationship with God (The first 4 of the 10 commandments).
ii)
Our
relationship with other people (The last 6 of the 10 commandments).
iii)
All
of the commandments affect either our relationship with God and/or with other
people.
iv)
With
that in mind, let’s look at Verse 37.
b)
Verse
37 says we are to, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and
with all your mind.”
i)
This
is a quote from Deuteronomy 6:5. It is
not part of the “10 commandments.”
a)
Verses
4 and 5 from Deuteronomy Chapter 6 are called the “She-ma” in Hebrew. Together they are two of the most famous
verses in Judaism as many Jews recite these two verses together.
b)
Verse
4 says, “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one.”
(1)
By
the way, the word for “God” in Verse 4 is “el-o-heem”.
(2)
This
is a plural-compound”
(3)
Think
of “one” in a plural form like “one group of people”.
(4)
I
see it as a clue of the Trinity!
ii)
Let
me give you an analogy that may help you understand Verse 5.
a)
Think
about when you were a teenager and first fell in love with someone. You wanted to know everything there was to
know about that person. You wanted to
follow them and just be with them. Everything
they did was “perfect and magical”.
b)
Now
think about the command to “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with
all your soul and with all your mind.”
(1)
If
you love God that much, all you want to do is focus upon Him, be with him and
do what he tells you.
(2)
All
the other commands about our relationship with God will fall into place
if we obey this command.
(3)
I’ve
once heard all the commands of God summarized as “Love the Lord your God with
all of your heart, soul, mind and strength and then do whatever you want”. Because if you are doing the first
part, (loving God this way) you will naturally want to obey everything
else He commands of us.
iii)
A
lot of people wonder, “What did God mean by “heart, soul, mind & strength?”
a)
Some
people use these terms interchangeably.
b)
It
would take awhile to explain the meaning of each one, but many argue (including
myself) that they each have a distinct meaning.
c)
In
summary, it starts with God working through us. He works through our inner-being (our heart), affecting how the
spirit works within us (our soul), affecting how we think (our mind) and how we
act (our strength).
c)
Now
lets talk about the command of Verse 39:
“Love
your neighbor as yourself.”
i)
This
is a quote of Leviticus 19:18.
ii)
It
is similar to the “Golden Rule” taught in “The Sermon on the Mount”:
a)
“So
in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums
up the Law and the Prophets.”
(Matthew 7:12, NIV)
iii)
It
sounds so simple. Just treat others as
you want others to treat you. That is
what Jesus meant by loving your neighbor as yourself.
iv)
The
idea of “loving” is to make them a priority.
It is about giving of oneself.
It is to give of one’s time and resources to others as you would
yourself.
v)
If
you read through all the commands in the Old Testament about our relationship
with other people, you realize it is all about “fairness” and treating others
well.
vi)
That
is why Jesus quote here in Verse 39 is a good summary for us.
d)
Here’s
something to consider: If Jesus is
saying these are the two greatest commandments, why don’t we pray these more
often?
i)
Our
ability to obey God’s commandments does not come through self-discipline, but
through God working through us.
ii)
If
Jesus says these two are the greatest commandments, I would encourage, say for
the next 30 days, to pray for God to help us 1) love him more with all of our
heart, soul, mind and strength and 2) to love our neighbor as ourselves.
e)
I
can’t resist sharing a famous story of a Jewish Rabbi named Hillel who was
asked to summarize the five books of Moses “while standing on one foot”. You can stand on one foot for a short time,
but after awhile you lose your balance.
The question was meant to ask to summarize the five books in a few
moments.
a)
Rabbi
Hillel didn’t even hesitate. He said,
“What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah (5
books of Moses). The rest is the
commentary on it. Now go and study the rest.”
b)
Today
there are synagogues named after this man.
c)
Notice
the similarity of what he preached and what Jesus taught.
23.
Verse
41: While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus
asked them, 42 "What do you think
about the Christ? Whose son is he?"
"The son of David," they replied. 43 He said to them, "How
is it then that David, speaking by the Spirit, calls him `Lord'? For he says, 44 " `The Lord said to my
Lord: "Sit at my right hand until
I put your enemies under your feet." ` 45 If then David calls him `Lord,' how can he be his
son?"
a)
Jesus
was done listening to questions. It was
time for Jesus to fire back.
b)
After
the audience of Pharisees and Sadducees were silenced, they were now ready to
listen to Jesus ask his own questions.
i)
That
is a good thing to remember as a teacher.
Sometimes people are not willing to hear what someone else has to say
until they get what they have to say off of their minds. Take their questions first, then ask your
own.
c)
In
Jewish thought, a father is always superior in stature to a son.
i)
For
example, a great-great-great grandson would be inferior in stature to the
great-great-great grandfather.
ii)
This
is Jesus’ point. The promised Messiah
is a descendant of David.
a)
Yet,
David called him “Lord”.
b)
A
Jewish father would never call one of his descendants “Lord”.
c)
Now
focus on Verse 44 where Jesus is quoting Psalm 110:1 with the phrase “The Lord
said to my Lord”.
d)
David
is saying in this Psalm, “The Lord (God-The-Father) is speaking to my Lord (The
Messiah).
iii)
Jesus
is asking a very good question. How
could David call his “son” Lord, and the Lord be superior to him as a deity?
a)
Again,
notice David calls him “my Lord” referring to the one who rules over me.
b)
Jesus
is trying to show how the Messiah is both a man (son of David) and deity (Lord)
at the same time.
d)
Let
me comment on one more phrase Jesus is quoting: Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your
feet."
i)
This
is the rest of the Verse 1 of Psalm 110.
ii)
What
does that mean? Does that mean Jesus
just sits there until God the Father “takes care” of Jesus enemies?
a)
Remember
that much of the Psalms, and the whole Old Testament for that matter are
different predictions about Jesus purpose and ministry.
b)
I
believe this one verse refers to Jesus work at the cross.
c)
When
David wrote this Psalm, the crucifixion and resurrection were hundreds of years
in the future.
d)
From
David’s perspective, the idea of “Jesus resting until God takes cares of your
enemies” refers to sin itself.
(1)
God
can stand no sin whatsoever. In the
Garden of Eden, God “declared war” on Satan and the idea of man’s sinning.
(2)
In
the sense of time and history, Jesus didn’t do “anything” until his appointed
time to pay the price for our sins.
(3)
That
is what I believe David meant by “(Jesus) sits here until God takes care of his
enemies”. It is a future prediction
that the payment for sin would one day be taken care of by Jesus.
24.
Verse
46: No one could say a word in reply,
and from that day on no one dared to ask him any more questions.
a)
Well,
there is that silence again. J
b)
I’ve
beaten that point to death, so I won’t go much further.
c)
Jesus
goes on with a scathing indictment of the Pharisees in Chapter 23, but we’ll
leave that for the next lesson. With
that, let’s wrap this up in prayer.
25.
Heavenly
Father, We too, when we understand our sinful nature, we too, can only stand in
silence before you. We are grateful for
providing a way to spend eternity with you, and for that we will be forever
grateful. Help us to see others
non-saved people with any sort of pious superiority, but as people who need
Jesus. Despite our faults and our
sinful nature, work through us for your glory so that we can be your witnesses
to a dying world. We ask this in Jesus
name, Amen.