Gospel of Matthew Chapter 15 -- John Karmelich
1.
The
one word I use to summarize Chapter 15 is “misconceptions”.
a)
Chapter
15 tells 3 stories:
i)
Some
Pharisee’s accusing Jesus of violating Jewish customs;
ii)
The
story of a Gentile woman begging Jesus to heal her daughter
iii)
The
story of Jesus feeding 4,000 men, plus women and children.
b)
Each
of these sections is designed to teach the disciples (and us!) lessons about
what following Jesus is all about and some lessons about what it is not
about.
c)
In
any religion, there is the danger of pre-conceived notions about what to
expect.
i)
A
related topic is the danger of “tradition”.
Church traditions can be dangerous as people can focus more on the
tradition than on what the Bible teaches.
ii)
The
next issue is the danger of “pre-conceived interpretations” of the bible being
the correct doctrine.
a)
Jesus
is the final authority on the interpretation of Scripture.
b)
One
of the rules of bible interpretation, including the Old Testament is: What does
Jesus himself say on that issue?
(1)
We’re
going to come across an issue like that in today’s lesson.
c)
The
second story in this chapter is partially designed to teach the disciples a
lesson about the role of the Messiah and the non-Jewish (i.e., “Gentile”)
believers.
d)
The
final story (the feeding of the 4,000) is also taught to teach us that Jesus
came to help Gentile as well as Jewish believers.
(1)
One
of the things you will notice about the feeding of the 4,000, when we get to
that section, is the setting is non-Jewish.
d)
One
has to remember that Matthew’s Gospel was written primarily to Jewish
Christians.
i)
They
had their own preconceived roles about God’s relationship with Jewish people
and non-Jewish people.
ii)
Matthew’s
Gospel is designed to present Jesus as the true Messiah.
iii)
Part
of that description is to clear up and change preconceived notions about just
what the Messiah is and what He is not.
e)
The
main application to you and me, is the about the dangers of misconceptions.
i)
We
as church going Christians can get stuck in preconceived notions about Jesus
and what he expects of us.
ii)
A
big reason for studying the bible is to show what Jesus exactly does expect of
us and what was the purpose of both his first coming (past) and second coming
(future).
iii)
Religious
“tradition” is just as much a danger today as it was in Jesus time.
a)
We’ll
cover that more as we go.
f)
With
the idea of the “danger of misconceptions” in view, let’s go to Verse 1.
2.
Verse
1: Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to
Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, 2 "Why do your disciples break the tradition of
the elders? They don't wash their hands before they eat!"
a)
Let’s
start by reviewing some of the events of the previous chapter:
i)
Jesus
just feed the 5,000 men, plus women and children in the wilderness.
ii)
The
disciples then sailed back across the Sea of Galilee. Jesus walked on the water and met the disciples in the middle of
that sea.
iii)
In
the last few verses, we read of the disciples landing in Gennesaret, which is
near the northwest area of the Sea of Galilee.
The local people saw Jesus, brought out their lame and sick, and Jesus
did some more healing.
b)
Now
we read of Pharisees and law-teachers coming to Jesus from Jerusalem.
i)
Remember
the Sea of Galilee is in the north-region of Israel.
a)
Jerusalem
was some-distance away, to the south.
ii)
I
suspect by now, the word of Jesus healing and miracles had reached the
religious leaders in Jerusalem.
iii)
By
this point the religious establishment may have acknowledged Jesus as a miracle
worker. Earlier in the gospels he has
already condemned some of the religious leadership as did John the Baptist.
iv)
At
this point in Jesus ministry, we’re not sure yet the Jewish leadership fully
rejected Jesus or they were still just “checking him out”.
v)
As
a reminder, the Pharisee’s were a religious sect of Judaism. They are the most conservative of all the
“denominations” that were around at that time.
vi)
A
“teacher of the law”, often called a scribe in the bible was not necessarily a
Pharisee. A modern equivalent of a
“teacher of the law” might be a seminary professor. It simply refers to one who is well educated in the Old Testament
and teaches others the doctrines.
c)
Notice
that these Pharisee’s and Law-Teachers ask Jesus, “Why do your disciples’ break
the tradition of the elders by not washing before they eat?”
i)
First
of all, we’re not talking about sanitary washing.
a)
In
Mark’s Gospel, Mark goes on to explain that the washing refers to a specific
ceremonial washing. (Mark 7:3-4)
b)
Matthew’s
Gospel was written to a Jewish audience; therefore Matthew didn’t feel the need
to explain that “washing” meant ceremonial washing.
c)
The
specific washing was a specific method of how the hands were to be
washed. It involves the position of the
hands and arms as the water is poured unto the hands.
ii)
As
to the washing itself, this is based on Jewish tradition. For many centuries prior to Jesus, the Jews
had a set of official commentaries on the Old Testament called the “The Oral
Tradition”. Within 100 years after
Jesus, these commentaries were written in a set of books known as the “Mishna”
and the “Talmud”.
a)
To
this day Orthodox Jews study the Mishna and Talmud.
(1)
Don’t
worry; you don’t have to remember those words.
J
b)
These
books are commentaries by Rabbi’s on how to interpret the Bible.
c)
They
often have contradictory opinions, as to show different views.
d)
Like
all good bible commentaries, a lot of it is good practical advice and some of
it is bad interpretation. Given the
fact that parts of these books are contradictory to other parts indicates in
itself that it is not God-inspired and they should be read accordingly.
(1)
On
a similar note, one should read all bible commentaries, including this
one with a “grain of salt”. The bible
itself is the final authority, not any commentary.
(2)
It
is ok to read commentaries. Remember
they are opinions and not scripture themselves.
(3)
I
myself strive to use the bible itself as my authority in interpretation and
application. It is also important to
state that when something is “my opinion” or “scholars disagree” to emphasize
that point as I try to do.
(a)
Ray
Steadman once quipped, “When the angels want a good laugh, they read the
commentaries on the Bible.”
(b)
OK,
I’ve drifted way off topic here. How
did I do that? J
d)
The
Pharisee’s and Law teachers didn’t accuse Jesus of this “crime”; they accuse
the disciples of not washing in the traditional manner of the Jews.
i)
One
wonders why they put the question in that format?
a)
Were
they afraid of asking Jesus himself why he didn’t wash that way?
b)
Did
they just see the disciples’ wash and not Jesus wash this way?
c)
If
they are accusing the disciples of this charge, then they are accusing
Jesus of the same charge in a roundabout way.
d)
Since
they knew Jesus was their leader, they were accusing Jesus of violating this
tradition by either not teaching it to the disciples or teaching them to ignore
that principal.
e)
The
application to you and me is the danger of church traditions.
i)
By
the time any denomination of the Christian church is established for a while,
the danger of denominational tradition comes into play.
ii)
Beware
of church traditions that are not based on a biblical event or scripture.
a)
If
a church has a ritual or teaches an action that does not come from the bible
directly then it is a church tradition.
b)
One
has to learn to separate “church traditions”, from bible-based ideas completed
in the church.
c)
For
example, I don’t have a problem with taking one day out of the year to
celebrate Jesus birth (i.e., a Christmas service).
(1)
There
are a few chapters in the bible dedicated to the birth of Jesus as well as a
few Old Testament references.
(2)
Therefore,
I don’t have a problem picking one day or even one week out of the year to
study those passages.
d)
One
can pick other examples such as the Lenten season.
(1)
This
is a tradition as based in the Roman Catholic Church that have a set of
religious services set up around 40 days prior to Easter.
(2)
The
problem is there is no biblical reference to anything special about the
40 days prior to the resurrection.
(3)
Roman
Catholic defenders argue that all of the “symbols” of Ash Wednesday (start of
Lent) represent events leading up the Cross.
(4)
The
problem with that idea is I can pick any ritual and make it
biblical. We can play “pin the tail on
the donkey” and say, “Jesus is the donkey and the pins are our sins being
placed on Him”. J
One can pick any ritual and allegorize it to be “Christian”.
(5)
When
the Reformation happened centuries ago, the motto was “Sola Scriptura” which is
Latin for “Scriptures Alone!”
(a)
The
idea was for the church to get back to what the bible taught and not the
traditions of the church.
iii)
The
reason I am making such a big deal about this is that I have seen churches get
away from bible teaching and overly emphasize church traditions.
a)
There
are so many Christian churches where their traditions start off nicely and then
becomes an obsession to their members.
b)
I
have seen people leave churches because they “don’t like the style of music” or
they don’t like the bible version being taught.
c)
They
develop a dogmatic view that it is “our way or the wrong way”.
d)
The
key is the bible itself. It is ok to
disagree with possible bible interpretation. The danger is getting away from
the Scripture in order to emphasize church tradition.
e)
If
you study the word “tradition” in the New Testament, it is never used in
a positive light.
f)
If
you study church history, you will discover that all the great revival
movements always occur outside of any traditional denomination. This is often because denominations start to
get obsessed with their own rules, regulations and interpretations to the point
where they can’t be used by God for any great new movement.
g)
OK,
time to calm down and get off my soapbox.
Back to the scripture! J
3.
Verse
3: Jesus replied, "And why do you break the
command of God for the sake of your tradition? 4 For God said, `Honor your
father and mother' and `Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to
death.' 5 But you say that if a man
says to his father or mother, `Whatever help you might otherwise have received
from me is a gift devoted to God,' 6 he is not to `honor his father' with it. Thus you
nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition.
a)
Notice
Jesus never answers their question.
i)
They
ask Jesus about why don’t the disciples keep the Jewish hand-washing ritual.
ii)
Jesus
turns around and takes it to a “higher level” by accusing them of having their
traditions nullify the word of God.
We’ll talk more about that in a minute.
iii)
Whenever
you read of somebody accusing Jesus of violating a Jewish or Roman law, you see
Jesus “take it up to a higher level” and ask the accuser a question.
a)
My
application is “you can’t put Jesus on trial” in the sense of saying he
violated some or any biblical commands.
(1)
“God
made him (Jesus) who had no sin to be sin for us”
(2nd Corinthians 5:21a, NIV)
b)
Whenever
Jesus is “put on trial”, he usually turns it around and puts the accuser
himself on trial. That is the situation
here.
b)
Jesus
responds by showing how another of their traditions violates God’s law.
i)
First
of all, Jesus is quoting Exodus and Deuteronomy.
a)
“Honor
your father and mother” is a quote of Exodus 20:12 or Deut. 5:16.
b)
“Anyone
who curses his father or mother must be put to death” is a quote of Exodus
21:17 or Leviticus 20:9.
ii)
Next,
notice Jesus says in Verse 4 “For God said”.
a)
Jesus
is acknowledging Exodus, Leviticus
and Deuteronomy, as being written by God, which means it is the Word of God.
b)
Occasionally,
you will here someone say that the God of the Old Testament is not the
God of the New Testament. Jesus refutes
that argument.
iii)
It
might help to explain the specific Jewish tradition Jesus is talking about.
a)
The
Bible clearly teaches that we are to honor our mothers and our fathers. This is one of the 10 commandments.
b)
A
proper application of that commandment has to do with financially taking care
of their parents.
(1)
Paul
himself taught this 1st Timothy Chapter 5 in his discussion about
providing for widows of the church. The
underlying message of that section of 1st Timothy is about how
Christians need to be financially responsible for their parents.
c)
There
was a view given in the official Jewish commentary. It goes as follows: If one had money and one wanted to not give
it to their parents, they could declare that money “For God’s use”. It is a pledge to give that money to the
(Jewish) “church” and therefore, they were not obligated to help their
parents.
(1)
It
was a “legal loophole” to get out of supporting your parents.
(2)
Jesus
point is that this interpretation (their “tradition”) violated the commandment
of honoring the mother and father.
4.
Verse
7: You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied
about you: " `These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are
far from me. 9 They worship me in vain;
their teachings are but rules taught by men.' "
a)
Notice
Jesus calls these Jewish experts “hypocrites”.
i)
The
word “hypocrite” derives from the Greek word for acting. It essentially means that your words do not
match your actions.
ii)
When
we get to Chapter 23, Jesus specifically calls them hypocrites 7 times!
a)
So
much for “having respect for difference of opinions.” J
iii)
The
only people Jesus ever criticized or put-down were the religious
leaders.
a)
He
held them more accountable than the common people of that day.
b)
It
is a reminder to those of us who teach that bible that God himself holds us
more accountable based on what we know and to teach it properly.
b)
Verses
8-9 are a quote of Isaiah 29:13.
i)
The
translation is not verbatim as the New Testament is Jesus quoting the Greek
translation of the Hebrew, and then to English. The Old Testament is directly from the Hebrew to the English. Thus, there are a few technical word
differences.
ii)
The
quote is the same. I suspect since
Jesus is talking to the Pharisee’s, he either quoted directly from the Hebrew
or the common Greek translation of that day.
iii)
Reading
the Isaiah quote in Isaiah itself, Isaiah was talking about the Jewish people
who were living at that time, roughly 600 years earlier.
a)
Isaiah
was preaching that the people of his time were hypocritical in their worship of
God. They were going through the
rituals, but their hearts were not in it.
b)
Notice
in Verse 7 Jesus says Isaiah “prophesied about you”.
(1)
Jesus
is saying that Isaiah wasn’t just talking about the people of his time, but
Isaiah was making predictions about the future.
(2)
Remember,
Jesus is the final authority on Scripture.
(3)
Much
of the Old Testament is designed to point to Jesus.
(a)
Some
of it, as in this Isaiah passage, even points the people and events surrounding
Jesus.
iv)
When
Isaiah predicted, “their hearts were far from me” it would refer to how the
Jewish religious leaders would not comprehend Jesus when he came.
a)
It
is not about the sincerity of the religious leaders.
b)
One
can be very sincere in one’s beliefs and be sincerity wrong.
(1)
You
can be very sincere in your intention and effort to rob a bank, but it doesn’t
make the action right.
c)
Having
sincerity in one’s religion is not enough to get you into heaven.
d)
That
is the point Jesus is getting at. They
went through their religious practices but missed the main point about the
Messiah coming for the forgiveness of their sins.
e)
The
modern application is the churchgoer who “goes through the motions” of coming
to church, but never applies biblical application to their lives. They read or hear the Word of God, but it
doesn’t change their personal lifestyle.
That is the idea behind Isaiah’s quote.
5.
Verse
10: Jesus called the crowd to him and said, "Listen
and understand. 11
What goes into a man's mouth does not make him `unclean,' but what comes out of
his mouth, that is what makes him 'unclean.' "
a)
The
accusation by the Pharisee’s is now the point of a lecture to the crowd.
b)
Remember
where not talking about “germs-unclean” This is about “ceremonial-unclean”
i)
When
Jesus is talking about “clean” it is a reference to our “heart”.
c)
One
can get into the whole topic here about foods Jews were not supposed to eat.
i)
In
Mark’s Gospel, Mark adds the editorial comment: “In saying this, Jesus declared all foods “clean.”” (Mark 7:19b, NIV).
ii)
There
is a set of laws given in Leviticus about types of land animals, birds and fish
the Jews are supposed to eat and which ones they are not. (See Leviticus 11)
iii)
Jesus
point is that the religious Jews became more obsessed with their traditions
they did about their behavior.
a)
Notice
this verse: He (God) has showed you, O
man, what is good.
And what does the LORD require of you? To act justly and to love mercy
and to walk humbly with your God. (Micah 6:8, NIV)
b)
The
point of Micah and Jesus is God’s requirements of us focuses on our behavior
far more than what we say or our “religious actions”.
iv)
Remember
that Matthew’s Gospel was primarily written to the Jewish reader. This is why the emphasis is on what is
ceremonial “clean”. A Jewish person
would understand what the word “clean” meant based on the Leviticus food laws.
a)
Mark’s
Gospel is primarily to the non-Jewish reader.
This may be why Mark said “Jesus declared all foods clean”. It is to show the Gentile believer that it
is not necessary for them to follow the Jewish food-laws.
b)
Do
I think a Christian who is from a Jewish background should still not eat
certain foods? It is not a
requirement. For a Jewish Christian, I
believe God does call on them to keep some of the Old Testament rituals only
to remember God’s covenant relationship with the nation of Israel. It has nothing to do with their
salvation with Jesus.
v)
The
most important thing to remember is perspective. Jesus is teaching it is what comes out of
the mouth (words leading to our behavior) have greater emphasis than the foods
we put in our mouth.
vi)
Remember
my theme for this lesson is “misconceptions”.
a)
To
many religious Jews, what they eat and other traditions have (or had) greater
meaning than their actions.
6.
Verse
12: Then the disciples came to him and asked, "Do
you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?"
a)
One
of the hardest things to grasp by becoming a born-again tradition is to get
past your religious traditions and upbringings.
b)
For
example, many Roman Catholics look at their top-ranks of bishops and cardinals
as being “more-special” then they are.
I am not saying they are bad people. I am talking about the mistake of putting religious leaders on a
pedestal because they study their bible more or have been given “rank” by
individual churches.
c)
The
disciples were a bunch of fisherman.
The Pharisee’s knew their bible backwards.
It had to be intimidating for the disciples to challenge the Pharisee’s.
d)
Intimidation
can be dangerous in our Christian witness.
We can easily be afraid to talk to a “scholar” or a “holy-man” about
Jesus because we are intimated by their education.
i)
When
I was a young-Christian, I had a religious Jewish friend who would give me lots
of arguments why Jesus is the not the Messiah.
Some of those arguments sounded impressive and at that time, I didn’t
know how to refute them.
ii)
Somehow,
I knew the guy was wrong, but didn’t know how to refute his claims. The good news is God reassured me through
those times to “stick with it” and not be bullied by intimidation. It was not “my job” to convert everyone,
just to be a witness for Jesus.
7.
Verse
13: He replied, "Every plant that my heavenly
Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots. 14 Leave them; they are blind
guides. If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit."
a)
Well,
so much for Jesus trying to save everybody.
J
b)
To
summarize, Jesus said we are to leave these Pharisee’s alone.
c)
That
means there were people Jesus didn’t waste his time trying to convert.
d)
Here
is a case where Jesus’ knowledge of people’s heart is greater than ours.
i)
There
are religious people destined for hell, as stated in these two verses.
ii)
We
don’t know who is and isn’t saved, but God the Father does. This is why God calls on us to pray for all
people. (Reference: 1st Timothy 2:4)
iii)
At
the same time we have to accept the fact that many people, out of their own
free will, will not choose to accept Jesus.
iv)
God
the Father knows who will be saved and who won’t. We don’t have that knowledge, and therefore, we pray for all
people.
v)
The
application to you and I is “don’t worry about everyone”. We as Christians are each given special abilities. God expects us to use those abilities to
serve him. Some are called to help in a
specific church. Some are called to
work with a specific family or a specific age group. Some are missionaries to specific location. The point is we are to focus on what God
called us to do and not waste our time doing what God does not call us to do.
a)
The
corollary is if you feel led to pray or witness to a stranger, go ahead. Don’t put God in a box and say, “My job is
only for this specific group and I can’t help anyone else”.
b)
My
point here is “don’t major on the minors and minor on the majors”. Focus primarily (not completely) on what God
has called you to do.
8.
Verse
15: Peter said, "Explain the
parable to us." 16 "Are you still so
dull?" Jesus asked them.
17 "Don't you see that
whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? 18 But the things that come
out of the mouth come from the heart, and these make a man `unclean.'
a)
I
always love when Jesus answers a disciple’s question. It makes my job easier. J
b)
Remember
the word “clean” here refers to clean in a ceremonial sense.
c)
I’ve
already discussed Jesus’ explanation of “don’t worry about food”. To summarize, Jesus main point is that what
“comes out of the mouth” is far more important than the things we eat. With that, its time to move on to the next
verse.
9.
Verse
18 (again): But the things that come
out of the mouth come from the heart, and these make a man `unclean.' 19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder,
adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. 20 These are what make a man
`unclean'; but eating with unwashed hands does not make him `unclean.' "
a)
The
one new clause is this set of verses is Jesus’ emphasis on “the heart”.
i)
First
of all, we’re not talking about the physical heart, as in the organ that pumps
blood. We know Jesus is not literal, as
the heart-as-an-organ cannot be blamed for murder, adultery, etc.
ii)
The
“heart” in Jewish thought, represents our innermost being.
a)
It
is the same as when we say, “I really feel this is the best course of
action.
b)
A
similar idea is when we say, “My gut tells me to do this.”
b)
These
few verses are a good summary of the “Sermon on the Mount”.
i)
In
Chapters 5-7 of Matthew, Jesus gave one long sermon. Bible scholars have nicknamed that sermon, “The Sermon on the
Mount”.
ii)
When
you go through that speech section by section, one of the underlying themes is
that our actions begin with our attitudes. Jesus dealt with such things as how we pray, how we fast, our
actions toward others keys on our attitude.
a)
If
we do religious acts for “attention-sake”, we have the wrong attitude.
b)
If
we do such actions solely to glorify God, we have the right attitude.
iii)
What
we have in Verses 19-20 is similar to the Sermon on the Mount theme.
iv)
All
the sins of our lives begin in our hearts (or “guts” or “feelings” etc.)
v)
We
manifest those thoughts into actions.
a)
In
Jewish thought, a sin begins with the action, not the thought.
b)
In
Christian thought, the sin beings with the thought prior to the action.
(1)
This
is a general rule for Jewish and Christian philosophy.
(2)
There
are exceptions.
c)
Personally,
I’ll take the Christian view here. J
d)
If
we can learn the “control the thought” or give that thought to God we can
prevent the action from ever happening.
(1)
“We
take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.”
(2nd Corinthians 10:5b, NIV)
10.
Verse
21: Leaving that place, Jesus withdrew to the region of
Tyre and Sidon.
a)
We
are about to move on to another story in the same chapter.
b)
Tyre
and Sidon are city-states north of Israel.
It is part of modern-day Syria.
The point is Jesus is now outside of Israel and away from a
predominantly Jewish population.
c)
Just
why Jesus withdrew is speculation, as the answer is not stated.
i)
Maybe
Jesus wanted to get some rest with the disciples in this area.
ii)
Maybe
Jesus needed to get away from the influence of the Jewish based Pharisee’s.
iii)
Anyway,
we don’t know the reason, just the story that followed.
11.
Verse
22: A Canaanite woman from that
vicinity came to him, crying out, "Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me!
My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession."
a)
First
of all, you have to notice Matthew’s use of the word Canaanite woman.
i)
In
Mark’s account, he used the more modern description of “The woman was a Greek,
born in Syrian Phoenicia.” (Mark 7:26a
NIV)
ii)
Many
centuries earlier, when the Israelites were about to first enter the Promised
Land, Moses commanded that all the Canaanite’s be removed (killed) from the land (See
Deuteronomy 20:17).
iii)
It
helps to read this verse in the perspective of a “condemned Gentile” begging
Jesus for help.
a)
Remember
Matthew wrote this to a Jewish audience.
b)
They
understood that a Canaanite woman is not part of the “chosen
people”. Jesus helping this woman
helped to show a Jewish audience that Jesus is out to reach anyone who
calls upon Him.
12.
Verse
23a: Jesus did not answer a word.
a)
Sometimes
the hardest things for Christians to deal with are when God is silent in
answers to our prayers. I take the view
that God answers all of our prayers.
Sometimes the answer is “no” or “wait”.
b)
Remember
that God wants to mature us as believers. God gives us the “no” answer as he knows best for us. Sometimes he wants to teach a lesson to us.
i)
Often,
I have seen prayers answered only after we have exhausted all of our other
resources. We pray in the beginning of
a situation knowing we have other options.
I have seen God do great miracles when there is no other
option. That way, God doesn’t have to
share his glory with others.
ii)
Other
times, it is a matter of perspective.
God may simply want to teach you or others around you some valuable
lesson. That may be the reason for the
reason for unanswered prayer, as we are going to see in this section.
13.
Verse
23b: So his disciples came to him and urged him,
"Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us."
a)
Visualize
a mother pleading for her son’s life.
He is demon possessed.
b)
She
is a non-Jew. She probably heard about
“Jesus this miracle worker”. She
probably heard the title “Son of David” refers to the Jews Messiah, but has no
idea what it means. All she knows is
that her son is in pain and she will do anything to change that.
c)
She
pleads to Jesus and to no avail. She
pleads to the disciples (implied) and to no avail.
d)
Notice
Jesus did not respond to the disciples’ request to send her away.
i)
Jesus
is trying to teach her and them a specific lesson about the “Son of
David” and thus, Jesus does not answer their request to send her away.
14.
Verse
24: He answered, "I was sent only
to the lost sheep of Israel."
a)
Here
is a verse that must be read in context.
b)
This
woman pleaded to Jesus as “The Son of David”.
It is a reference to the Messiah.
c)
The
Messiah was sent specifically to Israel, not to the Gentiles.
d)
It
was the rejection of Israel-corporately that Jesus then turned to
the Gentiles.
i)
Remember
that God the Father knows all things and knew all this in advance.
ii)
It
does not excuse Israel-corporately. It
simply means God knows all things.
e)
Remember
that Jesus does help Gentile believers in the Gospel of Matthew.
i)
We
read back in Chapter 8 about Jesus helping a Roman Centurion.
ii)
At
the end of Matthew’s gospel we will read that Jesus asks that we take the Gospel
message “into all the world” as part of the “Great Commission”.
f)
The
point is, until Israel-as-a-nation “officially” rejects Jesus at the cross, he
is sent to the Nation of Israel.
Individual Gentiles who get saved in the Gospels are sort of a bonus. J
g)
Paul
said, “I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the
salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile.”
(Romans 1:16, NIV)
15.
Verse
25: The woman came and knelt before
him. "Lord, help me!" she said.
26 He replied, "It is not
right to take the children's bread and toss it to their dogs." 27 "Yes, Lord," she said, "but even the
dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table." 28 Then Jesus answered, "Woman, you have great
faith! Your request is granted." And her daughter was healed from that
very hour.
a)
To
summarize, the woman gets her request to have her son healed by responding to
Jesus analogy by saying in effect, “Yes, the food is for those at the
table. But even the household dogs get
to eat the crumbs that fall off the table.
I’m not a Jew, and therefore I don’t get to sit at the table. All I ask for is the crumbs that fall off.”
i)
You
have to admit, Jesus “crumbs” are a whole lot better than the bread the world
has to offer. J
b)
The
most important lesson to learn here is that she changed her perspective from
“Son of David” to just plain “Lord”.
She calls Jesus “Lord” twice in this passage.
i)
Salvation
is all about Jesus being the Lord of your life (See Romans 10:9)
ii)
Jesus
is the “Son of David” to the Jews, but primarily he is Lord to us-Gentiles.
iii)
The
word “Lord” can also mean sir. I’m
guessing from the text that her limited understanding of Judaism is that this
guy Jesus is their king and as a powerful king, he can help someone who isn’t a
member of that kingdom.
iv)
This
is what she meant by “feeding off the crumbs that fell from the table”.
c)
In
a typological sense, we are that women.
i)
We,
as Gentiles (assuming the reader is non-Jewish) are condemned by sin.
a)
Remember,
this is a Canaanite woman. To a Jewish
reader, this is a tribe that is under God’s curse.
ii)
We,
like this woman plead for the sake of our loved ones to a Jewish God.
iii)
That
Jewish God was sent primarily to the Jews first. The bible is clear on this.
iv)
But
out of God’s love for the world, He has enough blessings for all of us.
d)
Notice
Jesus answers her prayers once she has her perspective right.
e)
You
get the impression it was Jesus’ intention to answer her prayer all the time.
i)
First
she needed to teach her and the disciples a lesson about perspective.
ii)
Remember
my theme for today’s lesson is misconceptions.
iii)
This
women thought she could approach Jesus as being “The Son of David”. It appears that approach is only for
Jews. She can approach Jesus as
Lord and was granted her prayer request.
iv)
The
other lesson here is for the disciples.
It is to show that God does have compassion for Gentiles who turn
to the Lord as well as Jewish believers.
a)
The
lesson of “non-Jews can be saved” is a hard lesson that took a whole generation
of Jewish believers to accept. Much of
the Book of Acts deals with that topic.
16.
We
now move on to the next story in this chapter.
Verse 29: Jesus left there and went
along the Sea of Galilee. Then he went up on a mountainside and sat down. 30 Great crowds came to him,
bringing the lame, the blind, the crippled, the mute and many others, and laid
them at his feet; and he healed them. 31 The people were amazed when they saw the mute
speaking, the crippled made well, the lame walking and the blind seeing. And
they praised the God of Israel.
a)
In
Mark’s account of this same story, we learn that Jesus goes to Decapolis (Mark
7:31).
i)
In
the northeast area of the Sea of Galilee are 10 towns. Decapolis means 10 towns.
ii)
This
is primarily “Gentile Country” and is outside traditional-Israel territory.
iii)
We
even get a clue that this is Gentile-country in Verse 31 as it says, “they
praised the God of Israel.” If these
were Jews, the verse would have just read “God” as opposed to the God of
Israel.
b)
This
is an amazing thing to visualize:
i)
The
word of Jesus spread around the area.
“Quick, that Jesus guy is here, bring out the sick and crippled. Let’s see what Jesus will do!”
a)
Boy,
is that an attitude we can learn from!”
ii)
Visualize
people without legs suddenly having legs.
Picture people blind, or deaf and/or mute from birth suddenly seeing and
hearing and speaking as if they were never born with those deficiencies.
a)
It
makes you ponder about people born with such deficiencies. There is always the possibility God is
waiting for the moment to heal them when it serves God’s purpose to glorify
Him. (God also allows such deficiencies
to exist for other reasons. Not all are
healed. A topic for another day!)
17.
Verse
32: Jesus called his disciples to him and said, "I
have compassion for these people; they have already been with me three days and
have nothing to eat. I do not want to send them away hungry, or they may
collapse on the way."
a)
I
have to admit, it would take a long time for me to get tired of watching these
kinds of miracles, no matter how many times it happens. Imagine legs “popping in place” or
acquaintances you’ve known to be blind all of their lives, now seeing. I can see why the local people hung around
for three days. I can see the crowd
growing day by day.
b)
This
verse could mean that either the locals haven’t eaten for three days, or now,
after three days, they were really hungry as the food supply is gone.
c)
The
principal here is that Jesus doesn’t heal people and say, “Go on your merry
way!” J
i)
Even
after he performed all of these miracles, he still had compassion on this
Gentile multitude and was concerned about their hunger.
ii)
A
great lesson to all of us that Jesus cares about our basic needs as well.
18.
Verse
33: His disciples answered, "Where could we get
enough bread in this remote place to feed such a crowd?"
a)
You
have to wonder why the disciples asked this question. Remember that not too long ago, Jesus just feed 5,000 men, plus
women and children.
i)
Maybe
they have short-term memories. Guys
forget things quickly. J
ii)
Maybe
they were too intimidated to ask Jesus to do that miracle again.
iii)
I
also wonder if the disciples had some prejudice because the multitudes were
Gentiles. They could understand Jesus
miraculously feeding a large crowd of Jews, but Gentiles? (This is speculation on my part.)
iv)
Most
likely, it was just short-term memory loss.
I know how we guys forget! J
19.
Verse
34: "How many loaves do you have?" Jesus
asked. "Seven," they replied,
"and a few small fish." 35 He told the crowd to sit
down on the ground. 36
Then he took the seven loaves and the fish, and when he had given thanks, he
broke them and gave them to the disciples, and they in turn to the people. 37 They all ate and were
satisfied. Afterward the disciples picked up seven basketfuls of broken pieces
that were left over. 38
The number of those who ate was four thousand, besides women and children.
a)
Here
is the miracle of Jesus feeding “The 4,000”.
i)
Some
really bad liberal commentators argue that both the “5,000” and the “4,000” are
the same miracle, but the internal evidence says otherwise.
b)
This
miracle of the “4,000 feeding” had the same methodology as the “The 5,000”.
i)
Jesus
is the one blessing the bread/fish and multiplying them.
ii)
The
disciples are the ones distributing God’s blessings to the crowd.
iii)
Like
the “5,000” miracle, it is the model for Christian service.
a)
God
provides the resources; our job is just to share it with others.
b)
We
draw on God to provide the resources so we can minister to others.
c)
In
the last chapter, I told you to consider the possibility that the feeding of
the “5,000” was a “Jewish thing” and that the feeding of the “4,000” had
word-pictures for Gentile salvation.
Since we all have short-term memories, let me describe further. J
i)
In
the “5,000” miracle, Jesus multiplied five loaves and a two fish. A total of 12 basketfuls were
collected of leftovers when everybody was stuffed.
ii)
In
this “4,000” miracle, Jesus multiplied seven loaves a “few” fish. A total of 7 basketfuls were
collected of leftovers when everybody was stuffed.
iii)
The
original word for “basket” is different in each story.
a)
A
Jewish “basket” is a small basket.
b)
Similar
to the size of a typical church collection plate. J
c)
The
word for “basket” in the “4,000 feeding” is more like the size of a clothes
hamper.
d)
My
point is more food was collected this time than last time.
iv)
One
thing that popped in my head is, “Where did the baskets come from?
a)
I
don’t think the disciples, in either the “5,000” or the “4,000” miracle, had a
bunch of baskets in their pockets. J
b)
Somebody,
or some people happened to have them.
c)
There
just “happened” to be just enough baskets to be used to distribute the bread
and collect the leftovers in each case.
d)
Remember
“coincidence” is God working in the background! J
e)
It
is another example of how God works in the background of our lives.
v)
With
the “5,000”, 12 basketfuls were collected.
There are 12 disciples, tying them together. Many also tie the “12” with the 12 tribes of Israel. Either way, the feeding of the “5,000” was a
very Jewish thing. J
vi)
With
the “4,000”, the audience was primarily Gentiles. The leftovers were seven large baskets. What does “7” represent to a Jewish reader of Matthew?
a)
The
number “7” represents completeness or wholeness.
b)
On
the 7th day, God rested from his work (Genesis 2:2)
c)
The
Sabbath, the day of rest is the 7th day of the Jewish week.
vii)
Let’s
stand back and get back to the main purpose of Matthew: It is to present Jesus as the promised
Messiah of Israel.
a)
One
of the promises is that Jesus will be a “light to the Gentiles”.
(1)
Indeed
He says, ‘It is too small a thing that You should be My Servant To raise up the
tribes of Jacob, And to restore the preserved ones of Israel; I will also
give You as a light to the Gentiles,
That You should be My salvation to the ends of the earth.’”
Isaiah 49:6, NIV)
(2)
This
promise is that Jesus will restore the “preserved ones of Israel, a reference
to Jewish believers and then (notice the word “also) that Jesus will be a
“light to the Gentiles” referring to Gentile believers.
viii)
Now
let’s get back to the “5,000 and the 4,000” who were fed.
a)
There
are 12 basketfuls collected from the “no-longer-hungry Jews”
(1)
This
ties to the 12 Jewish disciples or the 12 tribes of Israel.
b)
There
are 7 basketfuls collected from the “no-longer-hungry Gentiles”
(1)
This
ties to the “completed worked” of Gentiles who see the light.
ix)
If
all of this sounds confusing, my whole point is that many commentators see the
feeding of the 5,000 as being a “Jewish thing” and the feeding of the 4,000 as
being a “Gentile thing”.
a)
If
you see that, terrific. If you think
I’ve gone off the deep end and am spending way too much time studying my bible,
that’s ok too. J
b)
I’m
giving you a common interpretation.
Remember Matthew is presenting Jesus as the Messiah. He is given primarily to the Jews, but
second, to the Gentiles. That is the
idea behind looking at both “feedings”.
x)
Remember
that my topic for today is misconceptions.
a)
Many
of the Jews think of the Messiah as being for “them-only” and that the Messiah
would rule over the Gentiles like a conquered people.
b)
Jesus
is teaching that he is king of the Gentiles, but not as a conquering king, but
only to those who freely choose to accept him.
Jesus is our king out of our desire to make Jesus our king.
c)
To
the non-believer, Jesus will be king out of force. That is the consequence for those who willfully choose to
disobey.
d)
Well,
I hate to stop when I’m on a roll, but there is one more verse. J
20.
Verse
39: After Jesus had sent the crowd away, he got into the
boat and went to the vicinity of Magadan.
a)
Magadan
is one of the few places in the bible where archeologists have not yet
discovered the exact location.
b)
The
simple point is Jesus finished his ministry to the Decaplois region and it was
time to move on elsewhere.
c)
I
notice that Matthew never misses an opportunity to mention whenever Jesus goes
off by himself, or at least desires that opportunity. It is as if Matthew doesn’t want us to miss the point of Jesus
desire for solitude at times to be with the Father.
d)
On
that simple note, I’m running long and it is prayer time.
21.
Heavenly
Father, we thank you for these teaching lessons about Jesus. Sometimes we forget that God is working in
the foreground and background to take care of all of our needs. Like the
apostles, help us to trust God as the only resource of our life, as we draw
upon you to share the Good News with others.
For we ask this in Jesus name, Amen.