Gospel of John Chapter 19 -- John Karmelich
Supplement: The debate over "three days and three nights"
There is a traditional debate in Christianity that asks the question: If Jesus was crucified on
"Good Friday", and rose again on "Easter Sunday", how could he be in the grave 3 full days and full nights? You can make a good Biblical case for either a 3 "full" days or 3 "partial" days viewpoint. Since this question often comes up when discussing the crucifixion, I thought I would summarize each viewpoint:
"3 full days & nights" argument: This argument is that Jesus was in the grave for three full days and nights (72 hours), being crucified on Wednesday. The key scripture is Matthew 12:40. It says:
"For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. (emphasis added, New King James Version). There are subtle references in the Gospels where one can build a case for a "Wednesday" crucifixion.
"3 partial days & nights" argument: Most scholars believe that Jesus was crucified on Friday. They take the phrase "Three days and nights" to be a Hebrew figure of speech referring to any part of three days and nights. The Hebrew phrase "day and night" does not necessarily mean a complete 24 period. Psalm 1:2 has a reference to mediating on God’s word "day and night". It does not mean one literally has to read the Bible all day and all night. Second it is clear from the use of the phrase "three days and three nights" in the Book of Esther (Ester 4:16) that it does not mean 72 hours. In Esther, they fasted three days and nights. In Chapter 5 Verse 1 of Esther, she appeared before the king "on the third day" Therefore, in the case of Esther, it is not 3 full days.
Source: "When Critics Ask" Norman Geisler and Thomas Howe.