Chapters 13-14 – John Karmelich
1.
I
was debating whether to call this lesson "A tale of two cities" like
the title of the famous Dickens novel or "We may be bad, but what about
those guys?" I decided on the
later. I'd like you to bear me out
while I describe why both titles fit these two chapters, but why I thought the
second one's a better choice. Hopefully
after about a page of reading this you'll find this discussion interesting
enough to read the entire lesson. OK,
here goes:
a)
"The
tale of two cities" is also a nickname for the bible itself. That's because there's a lot of bible text
discussing the origins, history and final destinations of two cities. The first one's the obvious one of
Jerusalem. I've discussed through lots
of lessons how that city's where the Israelite kings ruled from and it's also
where Christians believe that the Messiah (that is, Jesus) will rule over the
world one day from. I'll make it brief
and just say that a lot of the bible directly and indirectly discusses the
history and destiny of Jerusalem. In
fact we will get a brief reference to the future destiny of Jerusalem when we
get to Chapter 14.
b)
The
other city believe it or not is Babylon.
There are six chapters in the bible among a few other passages that are
dedicated to discussing the future of a city called Babylon. Two of them happen to be, this lesson,
Isaiah 13-14. The other two chapter
pairs are Jeremiah 50-51 and Revelation 17-18.
If you read all six of those chapters together in one sitting, you'll
get a pretty good picture of Babylon's destiny. First a little history:
It's first mentioned in Genesis 11 when the Tower of Babel was
built. When it was at it's power peak
around 600 BC, it was one of the seven wonders of the ancient world. When the Persians conquered it without a
battle, it stayed occupied. When
Alexander the Great conquered the world, it is where he lived out the end of
his life. Although it's much smaller
today, it still exists. All I'm saying
is if you read those six chapters I listed about Babylon's ultimate
destruction, it hasn't happened yet.
Because we're about to study two of those six chapters on Babylon, I
considered calling this lesson "A tale of two cities".
c)
OK,
time for lesson title choice #2: In the
previous few chapters, Isaiah "beat up" Israelites pretty hard. The short version of the last few chapters
is the Israelites failed to live as God desires they lived, and now they're
suffering for that choice. That's where I got my second lesson title, "We
may be bad, but what those guys?"
The point is God may punish us if we fail to be a good witness for Him,
but what about those nonbelievers who hurt us?
What's God going to do about them?
In effect, Chapters 13 and 14 answer that question.
i)
In
fact, while most of the text focuses on the destruction of Babylon, which
wasn't a significant power at the time Isaiah wrote, the text also focuses on
the demise of the Assyrian Empire as well as the Philistines, which was
Israel's main enemy for many a century.
The short version is Isaiah uses these chapters to describe what'll be
the destiny of those nations that have harmed God's people. We also get some text about the demonic
power behind Babylon when we get to Chapter 14.
ii)
Therefore,
you can see why I liked the title, "What about those guys?"
2.
OK,
John good for the ancient Israelites.
Even if we accept the concept of God's future plans for the ultimate
destruction of Babylon, what does any of this that have to do what I'm dealing
with at this moment? Good question.
a)
First it's a reminder of
how much God loves us. If He's going to
destroy those who harm us or want to harm us, doesn't that prove God loves us
as He's hurting those who've done harm to us?
Let me think of a horrible tragedy:
Suppose we're crippled due to a situation where we weren't at fault,
like maybe hit by a drunk driver.
Supposed we know someone who was killed due to a terrorist or injured
for life due to an evil act? Remember
that God knows all things and allows evil to exist if for no other reason than
to prove free will. As I like to point
out, even atheists have to explain the existence of evil. Just because they
don't believe in God, doesn't mean they can explain away evil as a
"natural cause of life".
b)
The reason I'm getting
all "hot and heavy" here, is to realize that whatever suffering we do
suffer in this life, at the worst that's all we'll receive. To those who commit evil and ignore God,
will suffer for eternity for the harm they have caused let alone turning from
Him.
c)
My main point is to
realize how blessed we are, when God punishes those who turn from Him with
their lives. To believe in a God of
Justice is to realize people ultimately can't get away when they harm those
called to make a difference for Him.
One thing I learned as I started this ministry is that when you're
really making a difference for God, you'll know it as "stuff
happens". The reason I desire
prayer so much and a reason I pray a lot for people in ministry is I know to
really make a difference for Jesus means that bad stuff happens as a form of
resistance to our ministry. To quote an
old saying, "If you don't believe Satan is real try opposing him for
awhile!" My point is while we
should always do what we can to avoid danger, a price of being in the ministry
is again, bad stuff just happens when you're working to make a difference for
Jesus.
i)
OK, and what does all of
that have to do with these two chapters?
They remind us that God's still there despite all the suffering caused
by attacks of the enemies. The plans of
ultimate destruction to those who harm us is far worse than anything and
everything we have to suffer as a witness for Jesus. These two chapters are simply the first of a series of examples
of proof of how God loves us as He destroys those who wish to prevent us from
being a witness for Him.
d)
Therefore you can see
why it's tempting to call this a "tale of two cities" but a better
title is, "We may be bad, but what about them?"
3.
In a sense I've already
described these two chapters. They're
two of the six bible chapters that do focus on Babylon's destruction. The reason there is so much to say about
them is about realizing who is the power behind Babylon and the reason this
city is singled out. The short version
is this is where an organized resistance to God's plan for mankind was first
organized. (i.e., the Tower of
Babel). The Babylonians were known as
the historical home of the multiple God system that is prevalent in the ancient
Egyptian, Babylonian, Greek and Roman systems.
Isaiah will discuss the power behind those systems as He explains how
Satan himself used Babylon as a launching place against the will of God's plans
for humanity. Therefore as we read
about the nations that harmed Israel way back then is to realize the demonic
power behind those nations and they harm they do to those who are trusting in
God to guide their lives.
a)
In summary, a reason to
study these chapters isn't just to learn about the demonic powers that harm
God's people. It's not just to learn
the ultimate fate of those who desire to harm those God chooses to be a witness
for Him. It's to realize that God does
bless us by taking care of those who desire to hurt us as we trust in God and
to make a difference for Him.
b)
On that positive
thought, time for the details.
4.
Chapter 13, Verse
1: An oracle concerning Babylon that
Isaiah son of Amoz saw:
a)
The word
"oracle" refers to a speech.
The text is saying let me tell you what will happen in the future to
Babylon that Isaiah say. As I've said
in earlier lessons on Isaiah, when the text says Isaiah son of Amoz, that's how
Israelites stated their full name back then.
b)
Now that we've got the
"who" this chapter is talking about and who gave it, the rest of the
chapter will focus on the "what and the why". Before we start, remember that Babylon at
this time was not a major power. They
were a minor power as they did join in an effort to stop the spread of the
Assyrian Empire. They never threatened
what was left of Israelites living in the land until a hundred years after
Isaiah's time. Realize that Isaiah's looking
in the future to see Babylon's rise to power and eventual fall from power.
i)
So how do we know all of
this isn't just describing the fall of Babylon when it was conquered by the
Persians? As I explained in the
introduction, Babylon didn't end its history as a city at that point. The Persians and even Alexander the Great
made it his capital. My point is simply that the scope of these prophecies go
well beyond the rise and fall of Babylon as an empire.
ii)
All that I ask at this
point is we keep the "double scope" in mind as we study these two
chapters. As I love to state, prophesy
often has "double fulfillment".
There is a short-term fulfillment to validate the speaker and a long
term destiny fulfillment.
5.
Verse 2: Raise a banner on a bare hilltop, shout to
them; beckon to them to enter the gates of the nobles. 3 I have commanded my holy ones; I have summoned my
warriors to carry out my wrath-- those who rejoice in my triumph.
a)
Before the days of the
internet, and before electronics, if you wanted to get the attention of a large
group of people, how would you do that?
Besides shouting, you may raise a thing up on a hilltop for everyone to
stare out. You may call out to the leaders. My point is that Verse 2 is describing ways
of getting the attention of a large group of people.
b)
Ok, who's attention is
Isaiah trying to draw? Well in Verse 1
Isaiah said that this "dirge" is directed at Babylon. When Isaiah wrote it, Babylon was a large
city, but it wasn't the main center of power. At that time the "big kid on
the block" was the Assyrian Empire and their headquarters was
"Nineveh". God knew that
Babylon would rise to power soon. There
is a famous historical battle around 600BC where Babylon became the main power
to rule in that part of the world. My
point is simply that Isaiah is predicting not only the rise of this great
power, but it's fall. Remember Chapter
13 is effectively a "dirge" (a sorrowful poem) describing the fall of
Babylon. That'll become more obvious as
we go through it.
i)
I'm stating all of that
in order to say that the people being referred to here in these verses are
those that conquered Babylon. Again, I
need to state a little more of the ancient history of that city just to
understand the short-term fulfillment.
Babylon was conquered by the Persian Empire without a battle. They captured areas just outside of Babylon,
cut off the water supply and entered under the gate when the moat was dried up.
ii)
The point of all of this
is simply to say the destruction of Babylon like a lot of bible prophecy has a
double fulfillment. The short term is
the history as I just described it. The
long term is someday in the future to us when it'll be completely destroyed as
I said early. For millenniums bible
scholars think the ultimate destruction of the Babylon refers to Rome or New
York or pick your city. My view is when
in doubt, take the text seriously.
Therefore, even though Babylon is "nothing" today, I think it
will rise and fall again. The bible has
way too much space discussing its destiny to have it "only die" by
being used by other nations over the millenniums.
c)
OK, I don't want this to
be a history lesson. I just want you to
understand that when these verses describe altering a group and raising an
army, in the past tense sense, it did refer to the Persian Empire that
conquered Babylon without a battle.
That'll become more clear as we go through the rest of this
chapter. Keep in mind God wants us to
learn this not just to prove He knows history in advance, but that God cares
for His people (think you and me) as He deals with those who have or want to
harm us. With that said, Verse 4:
6.
Verse 4: Listen, a noise on the mountains, like that
of a great multitude! Listen, an uproar among the kingdoms, like nations
massing together! The LORD Almighty is mustering an army for war. 5 They come from faraway lands, from the ends of the
heavens-- the LORD and the weapons of his wrath-- to destroy the whole
country. 6 Wail, for
the day of the LORD is near; it will come like destruction from the Almighty.
a)
It'll help as we go
through all of this if we keep the big picture in mind. The lesson title I choose was, "We may
be bad, but what about them?" The
point is God's describing what will happen to those nations that mess with
God's chosen people. Let me put it this
way: Remember all my past lessons on
Isaiah about the danger of ignoring God or if we just go through the motions of
serving Him without putting our heart into it?
Well among all of that bad news is the good news that God cares about us
and cares about those who serve Him.
The concept of God wiping out those who are called to be His people is a
principal that applies all through history as well as eternal judgment.
b)
OK with the big picture
out of my system, back to the verses themselves. These verses are describing gathering together an army for
destruction. Stop and ask, how do you
conquer a large city? How does one
destroy an empire? It takes a large
army and planning. From God's all
knowing perspective, it's a "done deal". The point is Babylon wasn't just a city it was the headquarters
of a large empire the Middle East as well as more distant lands. For it to fall, it took another army
headquartered somewhere else. If you
prefer modern terms to describe the Persian and Babylon, remember that Persia
is essentially Iran today. When we speak of Babylon, think Iraq today. Also realize that the city of Babylon wasn't
wiped out in the fairly recent wars in Iraq, as the modern "Babylon"
wasn't a significant target.
c)
OK, let's make this much
easier: From our perspective, this is
all ancient history. I also see it as future as it describes some sort of
ultimate destruction of Babylon that'll occur as part of God's end time
scenario, when the Messiah "sets up shop" to rule the world.
d)
The reason the bible has
at least six chapters dedicated to Babylon's destruction is for us to know when
the "end times" is truly occurring as this place is completely
destroyed. That's why I think it's literal and not referring to the destruction
of any other city or system.
e)
In the meantime, it's
time to get back to the text.
7.
Verse 7: Because of this, all hands will go limp,
every man's heart will melt. 8 Terror
will seize them, pain and anguish will grip them; they will writhe like a woman
in labor. They will look aghast at each other, their faces aflame.
a)
Keep in mind we're not
talking about Israel. The chapter is a
"dirge" about Babylon's fall.
Therefore when it says "all hands will go limp" and they'll be
in pain and anguish, all this is talking about Babylon itself and it's
destruction. Again the
"short-term" fulfillment was the ancient history of the fall of that
city, and the future "long-term" fulfillment is about its ultimate
destruction, which again, historically has never occurred.
b)
Remember that we're reading
poetry. We're reading God say in
effect, 'These people have done harm to those I love and they'll suffer far
more and far longer than those who I have called to be my witnesses to the
world. What about the innocent who
suffer when a place is conquered?
That's why I trust in a fair God who judges all people fairly. Meanwhile, I see the big message all through
this text of "Who I love, I love, who I called, I protect, and even though
many suffer for trusting in Me, those who harm them suffer far worse". That is the essential message of this
chapter. Meanwhile back to the details.
8.
Verse 9: See, the day of the LORD is coming --a cruel
day, with wrath and fierce anger-- to make the land desolate and destroy the
sinners within it. 10 The
stars of heaven and their constellations will not show their light. The rising
sun will be darkened and the moon will not give its light. 11 I will punish the world for its evil, the wicked for
their sins. I will put an end to the arrogance of the haughty and will humble
the pride of the ruthless.
a)
A good question to ask
is, "How do we know this is not all past tense?" After all, history records the destruction
of the Babylon Empire by the Persians millenniums ago. How do we know we're not just reading a
dirge about its fall so long ago? To
answer it, consider the following facts about these verses and history:
i)
The dirge said the land
will be desolate. As I said, when the
Persians conquered it, they occupied that city. When Alexander the Great conquered the Persian Empire he lived
out the end of his life there. In recent history Saddam Hussein rebuilt part of
it, he hired local workers to do so. My
simple point is God's describing Babylon as being desolate. That didn't happen in ancient history and
hasn't happened yet.
ii)
Also notice Verse 10
describes the stars, the sun and the moon in a way that people can't see their
light. Remember that Babylon was
conquered without a battle. All I'm
saying is to take these verses seriously realize they haven't occurred in history.
iii)
Back when I started the
book of Isaiah, I said the scope of the book goes from the time Isaiah lived
all the way to the end of this age. All
I'm saying is I'm convinced these verses have the end time aspect of human
history in perspective.
b)
Remember why we're
reading this. It's to show that God
will make suffer those who've harmed those who are called His people. To put this another way, if you think it's
hard to be a Christian that dedicates his or her life to serving God, look at
how those who want to harm God's chosen people will suffer. As hard as life can be for those of us
trusting in His words to guide our lives, life for those who want to harm those
trusting in Him is going to be far worse.
If you get nothing else out of this lesson, just remember that key
point.
c)
These verses end with a
statement that God will put an end to the haughtiness (pride) of those who
refuse to trust in Him. The way I put
it is, "As much as I've sinned and messed up my own life, I'd still rather
be in my shoes trusting in God's complete payment for my sins than to be in the
shoes of those who trust in their own ability to succeed in life."
9.
Verse 12: I will make man scarcer than pure gold, more
rare than the gold of Ophir.
a)
I don't know how rare
"pure" gold became in Ophir or where that city was, but the text is
saying it'll be pretty hard to find something that pure. Again, remember we're reading a dirge
talking about the fall of Babylon.
Since it remained occupied after it was conquered, I see some sort of
future long-term prediction being stated in this chapter.
10.
Verse 13: Therefore I will make the heavens tremble;
and the earth will shake from its place at the wrath of the LORD Almighty, in
the day of his burning anger.
a)
If you read through
bible commentaries through the past few millenniums, they will state that
Babylon refers to whatever the most powerful city in the world was at that
time. Or, they may refer to Babylon as
a world empire that God will judge.
Whatever Babylon is, it is a future event that the bible is so sure will
occur, that again, you can read six chapters in it dedicated to it's
destruction. Personally, I'd rather be
too literal, than not literal enough, which is why I make the argument that it
refers to some future day when literal Babylon will be a center of power again,
and it's ultimate destruction. Remember
my alternate title for this lesson is "A tale of two cities", as the
bible has a lot of text explaining what will be the fate of the cities of
Jerusalem and Babylon. Just as I think Jerusalem
will have a literal destiny in God's plan, so I'll argue that literal Babylon
has an ultimate destiny that'll be a part of human history.
b)
If you have that picture
in mind, Verse 13 makes a lot more sense.
It's describing how the heavens (in this case what we see in the sky
above us) and the earth will shake when this ultimate destruction of Babylon
occurs in the future. Again, if I have
the choice of either being not literal enough or too literal, I'd rather play
it safe and be too literal. That's why
I argue for the literal fall of Babylon to occur sometime in the future.
11.
Verse 14: Like a hunted gazelle, like sheep without a
shepherd, each will return to his own people, each will flee to his native
land. 15 Whoever
is captured will be thrust through; all who are caught will fall by the
sword. 16 Their
infants will be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses will be looted
and their wives ravished. 17 See, I
will stir up against them the Medes, who do not care for silver and have no delight
in gold. 18 Their
bows will strike down the young men; they will have no mercy on infants nor
will they look with compassion on children.
a)
I can just hear a lot of
you saying, "I hate all this prophecy stuff. Just tell me how any of it affects my life today!" At the least keep in mind the God we worship
cares for us and will punish those who want to hurt us eternally. Even if we
get that, why should we read all of this stuff? So we know the ultimate destiny not only for literal Babylon but
for those who don't care for God and whether they realize it or not, such
people are trying to stop God's ultimate plans from happening.
b)
Let me put it this
way: Jesus said in effect that anyone
who is not for us is against us. The
idea of that passage (Mark 9:40, et. al.) is that anyone not working to make a
difference for the kingdom of God, is at that moment working against His desire
to develop an intimate personal relationship with what He created (us). All I'm saying is all this judgment about
Babylon is literal, but it also represents the ultimate destiny of those who
oppose His plan to spend eternity with those of us willing to draw close to Him
as well.
c)
Meanwhile, back to these
verses. Remember they are describing
Babylon. Verse 14 says "each will
return to his native land". Again,
think of Babylon being desolate. The
verses describe soldiers and innocent women and children being killed. Then Verse 17 says the Medes (part of the
Medo-Persian Empire) won't care for whatever silver or gold is there in Babylon,
but will just destroy Babylon's inhabitants as that is their marching orders.
i)
Verse 17 is the
short-term fulfillment of when the Persians taking over the empire. Whatever the long-term implication is, we'll
have to see in the future.
d)
Here's another question
to ponder: How do we know Isaiah's
isn't just exaggerating in his description of the Medes conquering
Babylon? How do we know Isaiah is just
using a lot of colorful language to over emphasize what happened millenniums
ago? For starters, in order to be a
bible prophet, one has to be 100% accurate in order to be accepted as a bible
prophet or be killed. (Deuteronomy
18:22). Remember all of this history
was in the future by about 200 years to Isaiah's time. While a lot of what Isaiah described occur
in history a lot of it as we read here never happened. Again if you read all six of those chapters
at one time, you can see the pattern that whatever Isaiah, Jeremiah and
Revelation discuss isn't a compete history lesson, but is something in the
"end time" future.
e)
If you don't care for
all this prophecy stuff, hang in there.
As we get into Chapter 14, it'll get more interesting as the scope of
these predictions discuss the demonic powers behind them. My point is this lesson is about to get a
lot spookier in the next chapter.
f)
However, we still have a
few verses left in Chapter 13 to get through.
12.
Verse 19: Babylon, the jewel of kingdoms, the glory of
the Babylonians' pride, will be overthrown by God like Sodom and Gomorrah.
a)
If you know the story of
Sodom and Gomorrah from Genesis 19, the short version is those cities were so
wicked, God made an example out of them by completely destroying them. The point is Verse 19 describes the complete
destruction of those two cities. Again,
this is some sort of future prediction, as the City of Babylon was never
completely destroyed. Let me now go to the last few verses of this chapter as
they describe the destruction details.
13.
Verse 20: She will never be inhabited or lived in
through all generations; no Arab will pitch his tent there, no shepherd will
rest his flocks there. 21 But
desert creatures will lie there, jackals will fill her houses; there the owls
will dwell, and there the wild goats will leap about. 22 Hyenas will howl in her strongholds, jackals in her
luxurious palaces. Her time is at hand, and her days will not be prolonged.
a)
The short version is
Isaiah's describing the destruction of Babylon as being so complete, it will
only be a place for wild animals to dwell.
By the way, there is some controversy over the exact types of some of
the animals listed. What isn't a
controversy is what's the intent of these verses: To describe the ultimate destruction of this city.
b)
OK, John, suppose you're
wrong. Suppose Isaiah was just being
colorful as he described what did happen millenniums ago. If that's the case, then you're saying we
can't trust the bible to describe history in advance. That's saying the bible is not 100% accurate as to its future
predictions. Remember Isaiah wrote this
centuries before Babylon's rise and fall of power. The true answer is we have to watch history unfold in the future
to see if this will play out as Isaiah describes it here. Personally, I'd rather bet on taking the
bible seriously than bet on those who ignore God and suffer a fate similar to
what's described here.
c)
Now the good news: We've finished the "dirge" that
describes Babylon's destruction and fall from power. Chapter 14 will focus first on "God's people" based on
what will happen to Babylon. Then it discusses the demonic power behind Babylon
and finally the chapter ends with the other "enemies of the moment"
(during Isaiah's time) and what happens to them ultimately. In other words, "Don't bet against God,
you may win in the short run of this lifetime, but ultimately to harm God's
chosen people or to harm those using our lives to make a difference for God,
has bad consequences as described in these chapters. As we go through the next chapter, keep that positive thought in
mind through this "bad stuff".
14.
Chapter 14, Verse
1: The LORD will have compassion on
Jacob; once again he will choose Israel and will settle them in their own land.
Aliens will join them and unite with the house of Jacob. 2 Nations will take them and bring them to their own
place. And the house of Israel will possess the nations as menservants and
maidservants in the LORD's land. They will make captives of their captors and
rule over their oppressors.
a)
Whenever I hear the
question, "How can we know for sure the bible is the word of God, at that point
I like to answer, "Look at the history of Israel". In the history of the world, there has never
been a nation that was conquered, scattered (key point) and then reunited to be
a nation again. Yet after it was
completely conquered by the Babylonians, about 100 years after Isaiah wrote
this, seventy years later, Israel was allowed to return to that land, albeit
part of the Medo-Persian Empire. About
40 after Jesus; time, the Romans destroyed Israel again, and the survivors were
scattered. Israel wasn't an independent
country again until the year 1948. All
I'm saying is a proof that the bible is God's word is to learn the history of
the nation of Israel.
b)
Which surprisingly,
leads me to this verse. Here is Isaiah,
100 years before the destruction of Jerusalem as a city and the end of the
Southern Kingdom, predicting that a new power on the scene that hasn't risen to
power when Isaiah wrote this would conquer and destroy the Southern
Kingdom. Despite all of that, these
verses are saying there'll be a future day when as God will once again have
"compassion" on Jacob. That's
the original name of the common ancestor of all Israelites before God changed
Jacob's name to Israel. When God's
invoking the old and new name for Israel's common ancestor in one sentence,
it's there to remind us that even though the Israelites still sinned by not
collectively worshipping God as He demands, He will still allow them to return
and prosper one day in that land. So is
1948 the fulfillment of this verse?
i)
Yes and no. Yes it's the start of what I believe is
God's desire to have His chosen people live, where He desires they live. No, in that most of Israel today is
secular. Remember the ultimate
destruction of Babylon has never historically occurred. I don't see modern Israel as the complete
fulfillment of this verse, but I believe it is a start to God's final plan for
mankind.
ii)
OK, John what if you're
wrong. What if the modern state of
Israel gets destroyed as say it did in Roman times? In effect that's God's business.
He promised that the Messiah will rule the world one day from Jerusalem,
and by watching how God's worked in history and how He's working today, I see
the rebirth of the Israel as a nation as the start of God's final plans. As to how it's happen, we'll have to watch
the details play out.
c)
Finally the verse says
aliens will join them. What does that
mean? The point is when the Messiah
comes to rule the world from Jerusalem it won't be a Jewish only state. There'll be Gentiles there working for Jesus
as He rules the world from there. Some
bible versions imply that Gentiles will be slaves of the Jews in that day. The way I view it is all who say Jesus is
the Messiah will effectively be slaves to His will as He rules over the
world. The point is if we believe in
Jesus as non-Jews we don't suffer whenever this day does occur.
d)
Let' return to Isaiah's
time for moment. The fear of Israelites around him at that time was being
conquered by the Assyrians. God's
saying to those Israelites, "Don't fret over that empire. However, there will be another group that
will conquer them and you. However
after they conquer you, your descendants will return to this land as He will
destroy those who wish to harm you. Eventually your descendants will rule with
the Messiah from this land. As to your
descendants, they'll make those foreigners suffer who don't want Him to rule
over this land.
e)
Keep the big picture I
mind. God's called us to live as a
witness for Him. The world as we know it will end one day when the Messiah rules
over it. We can tell when this will
occur by Israel living as God desires despite them being greatly outnumbered by
nonbelievers.
15.
Verse 3: On the day the LORD gives you relief from
suffering and turmoil and cruel bondage, 4 you will take up this taunt
against the king of Babylon: How the
oppressor has come to an end! How his fury has ended! 5 The LORD
has broken the rod of the wicked, the scepter of the rulers, 6 which in
anger struck down peoples with unceasing blows, and in fury subdued nations with
relentless aggression. 7 All the
lands are at rest and at peace; they break into singing.
a)
Keep in mind God's moved
the focus of the text from a dirge about Babylon's destruction to what about
the Israelites after all of that has occurred.
While the last chapter discussed Babylon's fate, this section discusses
life after whenever this future event occurs.
b)
Stop and read Verse 7 by
itself for a moment. Ask when in
history has "all the lands" been at peace? If you don't know history, this is a very rare event. I remember reading about a study of human
history that said there has only been a few short times in history where a war
wasn't occurring somewhere. My point is
I'm pretty positive this is a future event.
i)
How do we know this
isn't just talking about Israel after Persian Emperor decided to let the
Israelites go live in that land again?
(If you don't know your history, the Babylonians emptied Israel of its
people. When the Persians conquered
Babylon, and became the next great empire in that region, they let the
Israelites return. This event is
covered in the Old Testament books of Nehemiah and Ezra.)
ii)
Again, Verse 7 says all
the lands (plural) will be at peace. I
believe it's a prediction with a dual fulfillment. The "short term" fulfillment is 70 years after the
Israelites were taken into captivity they were allowed to move back to that
land. The "long term"
fulfillment is when the Messiah "sets up shop" (i.e., Jesus returns
to rule the world from Jerusalem) is when all the lands will be at rest. One of themes that has run through much of
Isaiah so far is about a world without war once the Messiah does come to
rule. I believe that's the long-term
fulfillment of these verses.
c)
With all that said, we
can now reread all these verses and notice how they're describe the violence
that comes from war being brought to an end.
This is a double prophecy written in a few verses.
16.
Verse 8: Even the pine trees and the cedars of
Lebanon exult over you and say, "Now that you have been laid low, no
woodsman comes to cut us down."
a)
To explain Verse 8,
first we have to remember it's an illustration. To state the obvious, no tree
can literally talk. What this verse is
implying is if there is no more wars, nobody will be cutting down trees to make
"battering rams" or fuel to keep warm. In other words, it is common to use trees for various purposes in
ancient warfare. Isaiah's trying to
describe a world of peace from tree's perspective.
b)
Also realize the country
of Lebanon had a lot of forest areas.
For example, a few hundred years earlier when Solomon was king, you can
find references to trees from that place cut down to be used to build Solomon's
palace as well as for the temple construction.
(That's in 1st Kings 4:33). OK,
enough about trees. Time to get back to
Babylon's destruction.
17.
Verse 9: The grave below is all astir to meet you at
your coming; it rouses the spirits of the departed to greet you-- all those who
were leaders in the world; it makes them rise from their thrones-- all those
who were kings over the nations. 10 They
will all respond, they will say to you, "You also have become weak, as we
are; you have become like us." 11 All your
pomp has been brought down to the grave, along with the noise of your harps;
maggots are spread out beneath you and worms cover you.
a)
I have to admit, I
really enjoy Isaiah's colorful way of using exaggerations to describe life when
the Messiah comes. First he describes a
lack of war from tree's perspective.
Here in these verses, Isaiah is describing life in hell from the
perspective of those already there, as they greet the new inhabitants. Does that mean the leaders of hell greet new
people? My view is it's a colorful way
of saying how much life will change from how we know it now.
b)
Let me say a few words
about "hell" while I'm in the neighborhood. First of all, Satan isn't king over it, he'll be the chief
prisoner of the place.
i)
I believe literal hell
as a place of eternal separation from God. I don't think of it as literal
torture as much as I see it as those who desire to spend eternity away from
God's presence and He gives them "what they want". Is it possible the text of these verses is
more literal? Could be. Personally, I see it as Isaiah using word
pictures that those living in his time era could relate to.
ii)
For example, Verse 11
describes hell as a place where maggots are all below you as you are also
covered in worms. Yes that's
disgusting, but again, it's trying to paint the picture of something horrible
as well as eternal.
iii)
Then we have the
"hell greetings" of other kings welcoming the Babylonians there as
they effectively say, Hey, remember all of that glory you enjoyed as leaders,
you have now lost all of that and you're suffering here in hell with us!
c)
I don't know how literal
this is, but personally I never want to get close enough to find out about
it. It's disgusting enough as it is
without having to ponder it further.
Let's put this another way: Do
you want an incentive to serve God, look at the consequences we suffer if we
use our lives to ignore Him and His will for us.
d)
At this point, Isaiah
"widens his scope" as to ask, "who's the power behind all of
this? So you know from Verses 12-21,
we're going to discuss Satan himself. OK,
here goes:
18.
Verse 12: How you have fallen from heaven, O morning
star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid
low the nations!
a)
Let's start with the
question: How do we know this is
describing Satan himself? Verse 12
describes whoever this is, "falling from heaven" and "cast down
to earth" and "laying low the nations". I remember when my daughter was little she
asked me why did God create Satan in the first place? She understood evil existed and there is a powerful source behind
that evil. My answer was for us to have
free will, God had to allow a powerful alternative to exist. It's the idea that power, fame and
accumulating stuff has appeal, but to only live for this lifetime is truly a
waste of life. God allows evil is due
to the fact that this world is corrupted by the existence of sin. That's why we need a world with a Messiah
ruling over it as to bring evil to an end.
b)
In the Gospel accounts
Jesus states that "I saw Satan falling from heaven" in Luke 10:18, I
believe that's talking about the same thing Isaiah's talking about here. Yes I believe Satan still has access to
heaven in the sense that he's the prosecuting attorney for our sins. (See Job
1:6). He did fall from heaven in the
sense that Satan was created to be the top angel to lead in the effort to
worship God. However, Satan wanted to
exalt himself above others, which is the point of the next several verses. Before I move on, a good parallel passage to
this one is Ezekiel Chapter 28 as it also describes Satan's power and his fall
from heaven.
19.
Verse 13: You said in your heart, "I will ascend
to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God; I will sit enthroned
on the mount of assembly, on the utmost heights of the sacred mountain. 14 I will ascend above the tops of the clouds; I will
make myself like the Most High."
a)
Verses 13-14 are five
fairly famous "I will" statements.
The essential point is they show how Satan wanted to be "God
like" and why he rebelled against God.
b)
As I thought about these
verses and listened to a few commentaries about them, I realized something I
never thought about before. Satan knew
he wasn't God himself. The last one
said he wants to be "like (key word) the Most High". This is Satan wanting to be God like in the
sense that he wants to call the shots.
Satan is well aware that God is God and in the end Satan will lose. Therefore, he, along with all the demons who
joined in his rebellion, are doing whatever they can to delay as long as
possible God's redemptive plan for man to occur. Why do you think much of the world is so "hell bent" on
Israel's destruction?
c)
Stop and consider that
Jesus said to be great in heaven, means we should desire to be the lowest of
servants in this lifetime. (See Matthew
5:19). My point is that Satan's desire
to raise himself above others is what God calls us to avoid doing in this
lifetime. Does that mean we can never
lead? Of course not. It's about
thinking we're better than others!
d)
In the book of
Revelation, there are a few strange references to the "Nicolatians"
we read in Chapters 2 and 3. The short version is whoever they were, they
desired to seek power over the church.
Jesus condemned them for thinking they're better than everyone
else. I bring that up here only to show
the similarity between Satan wanting to raise himself to be greater than others
and people today thinking they're better than others. God doesn't want us to avoid leadership, it's about thinking and
acting like we are better than others and living as subject to God's laws and
desires as we live as a witness for Jesus.
e)
With all of that in
mind, read again these five "I will" statements and one can see why
God demoted Satan from being the top angel to being an enemy as Satan desired
to be greater than others. That's a
warning to us about not only thinking we're better than others, but also to
fail to live as God desires, by using our lives to make a difference for Him.
20.
Verse 15: But you are brought down to the grave, to
the depths of the pit.
a)
I'm pretty positive that
Verse 15 is future. To share a classic
joke, "If Satan's already down in hell, then his chain is too long as he's
still doing damage in this world!"
b)
One of the classic
questions to ponder is why does evil exist?
Even if one is an atheist, one still has to explain the existence of
evil. There is no earthly explanation
for someone going into say a school and just start shooting people at
random. Yes some are mentally messed up
but what's the power behind people being that way? In short, we can't explain evil by looking at our natural world.
c)
The point is Verse 15 is
describing Satan's ultimate destiny.
Does Satan believe the bible is the word of God? Yes he knows it
well. The reason he and his legion of
demons work so hard to oppose people becoming Christians is he's trying to
delay as long as possible the Messiah from setting up His kingdom. To put it another way, there's a specific
unknown number of believers that'll be in heaven. Whenever that number occurs, that's when God will start this "wrap
up" plan for the world as we know it.
The longer Satan can delay it from happening, the longer it will take
for Verse 15 to occur.
21.
Verse 16: Those who see you stare at you, they ponder
your fate: "Is this the man who shook the earth and made kingdoms tremble,
17 the man who made the world a desert, who overthrew
its cities and would not let his captives go home?" 18 All the kings of the nations lie in state, each in
his own tomb.
a)
Verse 16 uses the word
"man". The scope of this
prophecy has shifted a little to describe the fate of "The"
antichrist and how his ultimate destiny is in hell. Realize that antichrist just refers to one who opposes
Jesus. "The" Antichrist is a
specific person who is lead by Satan to do his will some date in the unknown
future.
b)
So are these verse
saying "the" antichrist will be in hell or Satan? The answer is both. We have to realize that Satan isn't the
guard of hell, but will be the top prisoner there. Again we have this colorful language of other world leaders
"welcoming their new bunkmates" in hell. Actually all the text is saying is that other kings who have had
power, who would be amazed at how much power this "antichrist" has,
will be shocked at how he's brought down from power.
c)
So when it says the man
"who made the world a desert…and not let his captives go home" what
does that refer to? Realize that
whenever this man is on the scene, one way we will know it's him, is it'll be a
time of war bigger than anything we've ever scene. A lot of the world as we know it will be destroyed. A lot of survivors have to be permanently
moved to other cities. Bottom line, all
the "bad stuff" we read about in Revelation, occurs after whoever
this man is, takes power and desires more power and world control.
d)
Also realize that this
is not a "solo effort" by one man.
Whoever this antichrist is, he's the leader of a world army. He will come in peace as to say, "I
want all people to live in peace and do whatever they feel like doing with me
as their leader". Like all in
power, he wants more power and conquers more and more of the world. I'm stating all of this as to realize that
the text here is also describing those leaders under him who'll fall from
power.
22.
Verse 19: But you are cast out of your tomb like a
rejected branch; you are covered with the slain, with those pierced by the
sword, those who descend to the stones of the pit. Like a corpse trampled
underfoot, 20 you will
not join them in burial, for you have destroyed your land and killed your
people. The offspring of the wicked
will never be mentioned again.
a)
Remember the focus of
these verses is either on Satan himself or more likely "the" world
leader who we commonly call the Antichrist.
The point here is simply that when he dies he won't have a normal
burial. He will be so despised by God
for what he did, he won't even get a normal burial.
b)
Here's a question to
ponder: The text says, "You have destroyed your land and killed your
people." OK, what is his land and
who are his people? His land is
whatever land he does control in the future and his people are those who
trusted in him. Remember that he'll be
a popular charismatic figure who essentially says, "I just want world
peace where all of us can live however we like without having to obey any
specific religion let alone any of the bible's commandments." We have to understand from a non-Christian
perspective how'd that be appealing to much of the world's population. The point is a way we can recognize when all
of this is occurring is "the" antichrist will be a popular world
leader who'll first be a man of peace and then cause war to get what he wants.
c)
The reason Isaiah is
predicting all of this millenniums ago, is for us to recognize this when it
will occur. It's also to tell the Israelites of his day, that no this isn't the
end of us as we do have to deal with our enemies and our problems of the
moment.
23.
Verses 21-22: Prepare a place to slaughter his sons for
the sins of their forefathers; they are not to rise to inherit the land and
cover the earth with their cities. 22 "I
will rise up against them," declares the LORD Almighty. "I will cut
off from Babylon her name and survivors, her offspring and descendants,"
declares the LORD. 23 "I
will turn her into a place for owls and into swampland; I will sweep her with
the broom of destruction," declares the LORD Almighty.
a)
These last two verses in
effect return to the "end" of Babylon. A reason I suspect Babylon is going to be literally rebuilt one
day, is because the text is not only describing the end of the antichrist, but
the land he controls. Another way to
tell it's "him" is that Babylon will be a headquarters for him. That's why through the millenniums, people
have argued that say Rome, or New York or pick your city of power will be the
headquarters of whenever this antichrist appears. Again, I think a safer bet is to take it literally and argue it
refers to the literal destruction of Babylon in some future date.
b)
My point here is simply
that if you read these verses with literal Babylon in mind, they do make more
sense. So how do we know it's not
talking about the historical fall of that city? The answer is it was conquered
without a battle. It fell by a foreign
army crawling under the city gate and taking its leaders without a battle. There is an ancient tradition that the
residents of that city didn't even know for days that it was taken over. These verses tell of a great slaughter of
the lands that Babylon controlled. Yes
these verses have come true in the past tense, but I've always argued that
prophesy is "patterns" and there'll be a future destruction of that
city that will be exactly like it's being described here.
c)
My final proof of a
future literalness of this prediction is Isaiah is describing the future of
that city as being a place of desolation.
As I've beaten over our heads this whole lesson, it was not destroyed
when it was conquered. It still has
people living there today. All that I
am saying is Isaiah's describing the city of Babylon as being desolate and that
event hasn't happened anytime in history.
OK, enough on that, time to change the topic a little.
24.
Verse 24: The LORD Almighty has sworn, "Surely,
as I have planned, so it will be, and as I have purposed, so it will
stand. 25 I will
crush the Assyrian in my land; on my mountains I will trample him down. His
yoke will be taken from my people, and his burden removed from their
shoulders."
a)
Put yourself in the
shoes of Israelites listening to Isaiah.
They might think, "OK, all of this is well and good, but what the
Assyrians knocking on our door now, what about them?"
b)
In effect Verses 24 to
27 are the answer to that question.
It's God's way of telling us that not only do I know the distant future
and I'm telling you how the word as we know it will wrap up one day, but I as
God still care about the problems you're currently dealing with at the
moment. Speaking of problems of the
moment, let's get back to the Assyrians.
c)
Recall that the Assyrian
Empire lasted for about 700 years. They
were headquartered out of another part of what is Iraq today just as Babylon
was another city in Iraq today.
d)
At the time of Isaiah's
writing, the Assyrians were expanding and were moving south to where Israel was
located. They did conquer the Northern
Israel Kingdom and they also conquered parts of the Southern Kingdom. As I've mentioned in previous lessons, God's
going to wipe out their army at the doorsteps of Jerusalem. When Isaiah wrote this, none of this has
happened yet. Yet the bible has several
references to 185,000 Assyrian troops who were killed right before the reached
Jerusalem. (See 2nd Kings 19:35 or
Isaiah 37:36.)
e)
I'm stating all of this
because if you reread the last two verses with that fact in mind, they will
make a lot more sense.
f)
Also notice that God
refers to the Assyrians as "him".
The him is the demonic power who is behind their attack on God's
people. Just as Isaiah spent much of
this chapter telling of the ultimate fall of the antichrist and the power
behind him, so God's also telling us who's "pulling the strings" of
the Assyrians desire to conquer Israel.
The point is as we learn of bad stuff (evil) happening in our world, we
have to realize there are dark forces behind all of that, and we're reading of
God destroying the forces behind those acts of evil. Much of this chapter focuses on the coming Babylon issue. Still, for the Israelites their issue of the
moment was the Assyrians and God wanted to describe their destruction here as
well.
25.
Verse 26: This is the plan determined for the whole
world; this is the hand stretched out over all nations. 27For the LORD Almighty has purposed, and who can thwart
him? His hand is stretched out, and who can turn it back?
a)
These verses are
simple: God has plans and no matter how
hard Satan tries, he can't stop what God has planned. So if Satan knew in advance he'd lose, why did he bother to do all
that damage to Israel? Again, from his
perspective, it's about delaying as long as possible for his rule to end. If
Satan can wipe out God's chosen people before the Messiah comes to rule over
the world then he wins. That's why he
works so hard to destroy Israel from its existence both in ancient history as
well as today.
26.
Verse 28: This oracle came in the year King Ahaz
died: 29 Do not
rejoice, all you Philistines, that the rod that struck you is broken; from the
root of that snake will spring up a viper, its fruit will be a darting,
venomous serpent. 30 The
poorest of the poor will find pasture, and the needy will lie down in safety.
But your root I will destroy by famine; it will slay your survivors.
a)
Remember my lesson title
was effectively, "What about those guys?" When Isaiah began his ministry, there were other "those
guys" around. Most scholars said
Ahaz died in the year 715BC. That leads
us to the Philistines who were the enemies of Israel for centuries. They were living in the Promised Land since
the days of the judges. It'd be natural
for the Israelites to wonder, "Well, what about them, will they ever die
out?" They officially came to an
end when the Babylonians conquered Israel.
As I've stated both the Babylonian and the Assyrian empires would
separate and relocate prisoners so they won't unite to rebel against those
empires. My point is simply that the
Philistine nation came to a formal end when the Babylonians conquered that
area. Therefore, all these verses are
"past tense" for us and to the Israelites of Isaiah's time, this is
still over a hundred years in the future.
b)
The text ends with the
fact that some poor people will survive this onslaught, the nation of
Philistine as it was known for centuries, died at that point.
c)
I can't resist sharing,
for those who don't know: When the
Romans conquered Israel, they wanted to insult them by renaming Israel
"Palestine". That word is a
Latin translation of the word "Philistines". All I'm saying is when you hear the word
Palestine, it was given as an insult to the Jewish nation as to not recognize
who controls that land.
27.
Verse 31: Wail, O gate! Howl, O city! Melt away, all
you Philistines! A cloud of smoke comes from the north, and there is not a
straggler in its ranks. 32 What
answer shall be given to the envoys of that nation? "The LORD has
established Zion, and in her his afflicted people will find refuge."
a)
I know I'm running long,
but hang in there, as these are the last two verses in this lesson. The simple point is the
"Philistines" who were a thorn in the side of the Israelites for many
a century will come to an end by the Babylonian empire. They attacked the Philistine area from the
north, which is what's being described in a colorful way in Verse 31. The idea is a large army moving appears like
a cloud of smoke in the distance from all the dust being kicked up as it
moves. Verse 32 gives the impression
that the Philistines tried sending an envoy to the Babylonians to prevent its
destruction. God effectively answers
that request by saying, "This is My land and I decide who'll be here. Since the Israelites have failed for many a
century to remove you (Philistines) I (God) will take care of business by using
this big herd of an army to destroy you."
b)
OK John, that's all
interesting ancient history, why should we care and make it quick? The answer
is it shows that God cares for those who trust in Him and in His timing will
wipe out those who desire to harm us.
c)
Want a good summary of
this entire lesson? It's worth the
trouble and risk to use our life to make a difference for God not only because
we'll have a wonderful destiny for making that choice, but because God in His
timing will destroy those who wish to harm us as well as the powers behind
those nations. Therefore, use your life
to make a difference for God as that's the best use of the time that God's
given us. With that thought in mind,
let's close in prayer.
28.
Father,
this lesson is a vivid reminder that the most valuable thing you've given us is
our time to live in this world. May we
use that time to make a difference for You.
Guide our lives to live as You desire we live and give us the boldness
to do Your will and make it obvious to us what it is You desire of us as we use
that time for Your glory. We ask this in Jesus name, Amen.