Ezekiel Chapters 33 to 34 – John Karmelich
1.
My
title for this lesson is "Accountability and Leadership".
a)
Chapters
33 and 34 both deal (directly and indirectly) with accountability issues and
leadership. These two chapters give an
excellent guide in terms of what God expects of those in charge and what is
their accountability.
b)
Which
leads to the classic reminder: Aren't Christians saved by grace
alone? Yes. Still, if one is saved by grace, then how one lives their life should
naturally follow that faith.
i)
The
idea is that "faith and works" go hand in hand together. If one believes in God and one believes we are saved by our faith, then
one just naturally wants to do good works as to follow up with that faith that
is inside of us.
c)
Which
leads me back to accountability: I don't
believe anything we do or don't do affects our salvation other than accepting
Jesus as our Lord and Savior. With that said, I do believe God
holds us accountable for whatever role and position He has called us to.
d)
Whatever
specific gifts God has given to us, there is a sense that we are accountable to
Him in terms of how we have used those gifts. For example, if God has given us the gift to teach, we are accountable in
terms of how we use that gift. If one has a God-given gift of
"encouragement" or "giving", God holds us accountable based
on how we use those gifts. Does that mean we have to give
up our day jobs and spend 100% of our time focusing on those gifts? No. It does mean God holds us
accountable for the time He gives us on earth and expects us to use our time
wisely for Him.
i)
God
understands we still have to make a living and get "stuff" done. At the same time, God gives all Christians spiritual gifts. There is accountability in the sense that He expects us (Christians) to
use those gifts for Him and He would like to use us to bring glory to Him in
all that we do.
2.
This
leads us back to the lesson theme. Let's talk
about what is "going on" in these two chapters:
a)
In
Chapter 33, God lectures Ezekiel on the issue of being a "watchman". A "watchman" was somebody who worked the lookout tower of the
city walls watching for enemies. If a
watchman saw the enemy coming and then warned those living in the city, then
the watchman has done his job and God does not hold him accountable if that
watchman has done his job. If the watchman fails to warn
the people, then God holds the watchman accountable for his failure to do his
job. The underlying idea is that Ezekiel has been warning
everybody of the coming danger and no one has listened.
b)
In
Chapter 34, the issue is the leaders of Israel at that time. It can refer to both the spiritual as well as the civil leaders. The point is God holds them accountable if they fail to lead His people. The other point in this chapter is a promise that God Himself will lead
them! It is another hint of the Messiah to come!
3.
With
that said, it's time to talk a little about our limits of accountability before
God:
a)
Does
God hold us accountable if the person we are witnessing to does not accept
Christ? The answer is a "strong
no". One's salvation is an individual
choice and "that's it". God holds us
accountable to "do our jobs for Him", but the results are up to God
and not us.
b)
That
is what is being taught in these chapters. The idea is
that God holds leaders and "watchman" and "us" accountable
for what He wants us to do for Him in our lives, but the results are strictly
up to God and not up to us.
c)
If
we fail in our particular role for God, somehow, someway, God will raise up
other people to be His witnesses. God's
"work" still goes on whether or not we are witnesses for Him or not. The danger of messing up is we can lose rewards or God can take away or
limit our "witness" for Him.
4.
As
one can tell, the issue here is much more than being the leader of a church or
say, a leader of a town or country. God calls
most of us into some sort of leadership role at some point of our life. At the least, God gives each of us special spiritual gifts and expects us
to use them for His glory. No matter what is one's status
as a Christian, the issue of responsibility affects all of us.
a)
What
if I don't know what God calls me to do? Start with
asking Him. Some churches and denominations
have put together written tests to determine what one's spiritual gift(s) are. The better tests include asking a few Christian friends if you or I have
a particular gift. That way, it is not just
"us" thinking we have a particular gift, but other Christians have
also noticed we have such special talents.
b)
I
have found one of the great joys in ministry is to combine one's spiritual
gifts with something we enjoy doing or something we are good at already.
i)
For
example, some people work well with children and some work well with adults. Spiritual gifts can include teaching roles and "helping" roles.
ii)
For
me personally, God combined my ability to write with my love of scripture to
start this ministry.
iii)
The
point is to find what one enjoys doing and combine it with some sort of work
for God.
iv)
I
should also say that one's spiritual gift does not get one out of doing chores
either around the church or around the house. Not too many people would consider "washing dishes" their
spiritual gift, but that chore has to be done. I'm using "dishes" as an example that everyone has to do their
part to help out and sometimes that means doing a task one is not particularly
fond of doing.
a)
The
point is our role as Christians should never be limited to just using one's
spiritual gifts. There are times and places where
we simply need to help out based on whatever the situation calls for.
c)
OK,
now that I've got everyone thinking about what should our role or duty be for
Christ, I can start to focus on the text itself and we'll discuss those roles
and accountability.
5.
Chapter
33, Verse 1: The word of the LORD came to me:
a)
The chapter begins with
another vision of God to Ezekiel. There is no time stamp here.
b)
We know this occurred
soon after the news of Jerusalem falling reaching Ezekiel and his fellow Jews
in Babylon because Verse 21 of this chapter says that news just reached them.
6.
Verse
2: "Son
of man, speak to your countrymen and say to them: `When I bring the sword
against a land, and the people of the land choose one of their men and make him
their watchman, 3 and he sees the sword coming against the land and
blows the trumpet to warn the people, 4 then if anyone hears the trumpet but does not take
warning and the sword comes and takes his life, his blood will be on his own
head.0
a)
From Verse 2 through
Verse 5 is Ezekiel laying out a principal through a parable.
b)
The essential idea of
this parable is about a city that has a danger of enemies attacking.
Therefore, the city puts a guard in the
tower with the job of watching out for invaders. The job of the watchman is in this case to blow the
trumpet to warn the town.
i)
The
principal so far is that if a person living in this city hears the trumpet and
ignores it, no blame will be given to the trumpet blower as he did his part.
c)
One
thing that will become clear later in this chapter is the focus is not so much
on the trumpet blower, but on the fact the people of the town did not respond. The underlying point is that the Israelites failed to respond to Ezekiel
of the cost of turning from God.
i)
The
idea here is that Ezekiel has done his job of communicating God's message. The problem is the Israelites who heard God's message did not respond.
This leads to my accountability issue. The
Israelites have heard God's message of repentance. The fact that they have not changed their ways means they are
"accountable" for knowing better, and still, have not changed.
d)
Let
me give the rest of this parable and then some more comments.
7.
Verse
5: Since
he heard the sound of the trumpet but did not take warning, his blood will be
on his own head. If he had taken warning, he would have saved himself. 6 But if
the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the
people and the sword comes and takes the life of one of them, that man will be
taken away because of his sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for his
blood.'
a)
The
point of this parable is that if the guy on the tower failed to blow the horn
and warn the people, then the horn blower is at fault and God will hold the
horn blower accountable. If the horn blower did his job
and then the city failed to react, the blame is only on the residents of the
city and not the horn blower.
b)
The principal of this
five line principal is that God holds us accountable for our actions.
The man with the horn has a
responsibility and God holds him accountable. If the people of the town hear the horn and fail to
react, God will hold them accountable.
i)
You may ask, "Well,
what about the invading army? Aren't they to blame? The issue is not whether or not the invaders were
"fair or not". The
issue is about leadership and following that leader and do we do what we are
supposed to do!
c)
The
point is that God called Ezekiel to be a preacher "32 chapters ago". ☺ At this point, the Israelites cannot blame the messenger
in that Ezekiel did his job of warning the people, but the truth is the people
refused to change based on Ezekiel's message.
d)
This
gets back to my opening comments about accountability. God does not hold us accountable for the salvation of others, but God
does hold us accountable to be a witness for Him. God gives us talents and puts us in positions and holds us accountable
for the positions he gives us. Further, God can hold us
accountable when other people witness to us and we fail to react. Think of
those who fail to seek God despite being told by witness after witness of the
necessity of serving God!
i)
This
type of accountability is the underlying message of the whole chapter!
8.
Verse
7: "Son
of man, I have made you a watchman for the house of Israel; so hear the word I
speak and give them warning from me. 8 When I say to the wicked, `O wicked man, you will
surely die,' and you do not speak out to dissuade him from his ways, that
wicked man will die for his sin, and I will hold you accountable for his blood.
9 But if you do warn the wicked man to turn from his ways and he does
not do so, he will die for his sin, but you will have saved yourself.
a)
In case you had any
doubts that this parable is about God judging Israel for their sins, these
verses make it more obvious.
i)
In other words, the
point of the parable in Verses 2-6 is explained here.
b)
These verses are
"for" Ezekiel. God
gave him the specific task to speak God's words to the Israelites and God held
Ezekiel accountable to preach what God told him to preach.
c)
At the same time, God
held the Israelites accountable to "obey" Ezekiel.
God gave Ezekiel enough validations to
know that his words will come true. Ezekiel is filled with historical details that were
stated in advance that proved Ezekiel's messages were from God.
With that truth stated, the people were
held accountable to trust in Ezekiel.
d)
The message itself has
to do with obedience to God. The nation of Israel at this time in history had
turned their collective backs on God and worshipped idols.
Yes, they still gave God "lip
service" and went through some of the Jewish rituals, but at the same time
they were guilty of violating the law and worshipping other gods as well.
e)
The point is not
that each of us are responsible for the repentance of others.
The point is that God calls each of us to
be witnesses for Him. The
results are up to God and not us.
i)
This does not usually
mean (there are exceptions) where we have to quit our jobs or "quit our
lives" as we know it to be witnesses for Him.
We can be witnesses for God right where
we are in our lives. It
does not mean we use our work time to preach for Him in the sense that
we are hired to do a job and not to violate that job.
The point is we use are free time wisely.
We belong to God and "live for
Him".
9.
Verse
10: "Son
of man, say to the house of Israel, `This is what you are saying: "Our
offenses and sins weigh us down, and we are wasting away because of them. How
then can we live?" ' 11 Say to them, `As surely as I live, declares the
Sovereign LORD, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that
they turn from their ways and live. Turn! Turn from your evil ways! Why will
you die, O house of Israel?'
a)
The Israelites listening
to Ezekiel understood their guilt. Give the Israelites enough credit to understand they
have collectively turned their backs on God.
i)
With that said, the
Israelites were asking Ezekiel the question, "How can we have eternal
life? We are
"stuck" with our sins and are guilty of them.
ii)
That leads to the
question of how can a perfect God forgive us and then "still be
perfect"? The
answer has to do with God Himself paying the price for the sins.
That fact is not mentioned, but implied
in the sense God is willing to forgive them!
b)
This leads back to the
text itself. God
is saying through Ezekiel that He (God) has no pleasure in the death of the
wicked and therefore, God is more than willing to forgive all of one's sins if
one is willing to change their lifestyle and turn to God.
i)
The idea is that as long
as one is living on earth, one always has the opportunity to turn from one's
lifestyle and turn to God. If that is true, why should someone turn
"now" and not just wait until their deathbed?
a)
One reason is one never
knows when one is going to die. You or I could die today and never have that
opportunity. The
second answer is living for God now leads to more fulfilling life than any
alternative choice.
c)
The text says in Verse
11, " I (God) take no pleasure in the death of the wicked".
I've been stating that fact on and off
for the last few lessons. Every
time the text has a "dirge" for the death of those who turn from Him,
I've made the statement in effect that God has no pleasure in the death of the
wicked. Here,
God states that principal literally. ☺
10.
Verse
12: "Therefore,
son of man, say to your countrymen, `The righteousness of the righteous man
will not save him when he disobeys, and the wickedness of the wicked man will
not cause him to fall when he turns from it. The righteous man, if he sins,
will not be allowed to live because of his former righteousness.' 13 If I
tell the righteous man that he will surely live, but then he trusts in his
righteousness and does evil, none of the righteous things he has done will be
remembered; he will die for the evil he has done. 14 And if I
say to the wicked man, `You will surely die,' but he then turns away from his
sin and does what is just and right-- 15 if he gives back what he took in pledge for a loan,
returns what he has stolen, follows the decrees that give life, and does no
evil, he will surely live; he will not die. 16 None of the sins he has
committed will be remembered against him. He has done what is just and right;
he will surely live.
a)
The idea of these five
verses is that if a "righteous person" turns from his or her
righteous ways and becomes wicked, that person will not make it into heaven.
At the same time, if a wicked man truly
repents and starts to live for God, that person is saved.
b)
OK, let me ask the tough
question: What
if a truly good person has a bad day or a bad week.
Is that person still saved?
The answer is yes, if they have a heart
for God. The
issue is not about making mistakes. The issue is whether or not one's heart is for God or
against God. The
text is not teaching about being perfect. The text is teaching about one truly changing one's
heart about one's attitude for God and the life that follows.
c)
This leads to another
tough question: Does
this mean someone can lose their salvation? The safe answer is to say, "As long as one is
trusting in Jesus Christ (and understands who He is), one is always
saved." The
problem from our perspective is that we as humans can't judge someone's heart,
only their behavior. Therefore
we make our judgments on people based on their behavior.
God knows the heart and judges
accordingly.
i)
This is why in the New
Testament, we are told to judge behavior when it comes to making decisions
about who to "be with". God wants us to judge behavior when it comes to the
issue of who to trust and who to be with in "church" fellowship.
ii)
This is what Jesus meant
in Matthew 16:19 when Jesus told Peter that whoever he "binds on
earth" will be "bound in heaven". That means the church makes the decision who can and
cannot join. We
are to judge behavior and act accordingly.
iii)
When it comes to
salvation itself, we are not to judge whether or not someone is saved as only
God can read people's hearts. One has to separate judgment of one's lifestyle (that
is acceptable) from judgment of salvation (that is unacceptable).
iv)
All
of this is "stated" in this text in Ezekiel in an indirect way. In the New Testament, these principals are more blatantly taught by
Jesus. In the Old Testament, these
principals are given in text like this.
d)
Before
I move on, let me comment on Verse 15. That verse
says that, "If he gives back what he
took in pledge for a loan, returns what he has stolen, follows the decrees that
give life, and does no evil, he will surely live; he will not die."
i)
My point is Verse 15 is
a good example where we can judge people's hearts about their actions.
If somebody returns what is stolen, it is
a sign that their heart is in the right place and we should judge their
behavior accordingly.
ii)
My other point is that
"returning stolen goods" is not the only example, but is listed in this
text as an obvious example of how to judge one's behavior.
11.
Verse
17: "Yet
your countrymen say, `The way of the Lord is not just.' But it is their way
that is not just. 18 If a righteous man turns from his righteousness and
does evil, he will die for it. 19 And if a wicked man turns away from his wickedness
and does what is just and right, he will live by doing so. 20 Yet, O
house of Israel, you say, `The way of the Lord is not just.' But I will judge
each of you according to his own ways."
a)
Notice Verse 17 says,
"Your countrymen say". In other words, the rest of this paragraph is an
expression that was popular among Israelites. The saying is that God is not fair to use a system
where a righteous person who does evil will be sent to hell and a bad person who
sincerely turns to God will be forgiven eternally.
i)
The response is in
effect, "Who are you to argue with God? It is His world and therefore, it is His privilege to
make the rules about salvation."
ii)
The complaint was in
effect, "Is it fair of God to condemn someone who has been good all of
their life and then change for the worse to be condemned"?
a)
The answer is that if a
person truly wants to turn from God, why should God want to spend eternity with
that person? At
the same time, if a wicked person truly wants to be with God for eternity and
turn from their sins, then God is willing to welcome that person with open
arms.
b)
Again, the issue is not
about a good person having a bad day. The best of people still sin at times.
The issue is our heart and do we desire
to please God in all that we do.
b)
The point is God will
judge us based on how we act. If we truly want to turn from God then we will be
judged accordingly. If
we truly desire to turn to God, no matter what we have done in our lives, then
we are saved. This
also leads back to the issue of "why should we turn to God now", but
I already covered that question under Verses 10-11.
12.
Verse
21: In
the twelfth year of our exile, in the tenth month on the fifth day, a man who
had escaped from Jerusalem came to me and said, "The city has
fallen!" 22 Now the evening before the man arrived, the hand of
the LORD was upon me, and he opened my mouth before the man came to me in the
morning. So my mouth was opened and I was no longer silent.
a)
This is a key point in
time here. This
is when the Jewish exiles in Babylon discover that Jerusalem has fallen.
It took about eight months for those Jews
in Babylon to hear the news about the fall of Jerusalem.
One has to remember that those who
escaped had to sneak their way to the Jewish refugees living in Babylon
(several hundred miles away) to report this news. (The date of the fall of Jerusalem is in 2nd Kings
25:8. 2nd Kings uses the
reign of Nebuchadnezzar to mark time and Ezekiel marks time by their exile.)
b)
Verse 22 says that the night
before the man arrived to announce the fall of Jerusalem, God was "upon
Ezekiel" and told Ezekiel he didn't have to be silent anymore.
i)
Well, for a guy who has
been talking for about 33 chapters so, far, I'm pretty surprised that he was
"silent" all of this time. ☺
ii)
To
understand this, we have to go back to Ezekiel Chapter 3 (Verses 26-27). God said then, "I will make your
tongue stick to the roof of your mouth so that you will be silent and unable to
rebuke them, though they are a rebellious house."
a)
Does this
mean Ezekiel was really "silent" for about 30 chapters and was just
acting out what God had told him? Not exactly.
b)
For the most
part God told Ezekiel back in the early chapters to act out the siege of
Jerusalem and to do visual demonstrations. If you recall from those early chapters,
Ezekiel built a scale model of Jerusalem and Ezekiel also had to lay on his
sides for well over a year as a demonstration.
iii)
By the way,
"Ezekiel's silence" had nothing to do with
Ezekiel preaching about the destruction of the other nations, which was
Chapters 25-32. The silence was about preaching against
the destruction of Jerusalem. If you go through the other chapters,
Ezekiel preached on the sins of Israel but if you read it carefully, Ezekiel
was actually silent on this particular topic of Jerusalem's destruction. One also has to
study some of the date stamps of Ezekiel's preaching to Israel to get this.
13.
Verse 23: Then the word of the LORD
came to me: 24 "Son of man, the people living in those ruins in
the land of Israel are saying, `Abraham was only one man, yet he possessed the
land. But we are many; surely the land has been given to us as our possession.'
25 Therefore say to them, `This is what the Sovereign
LORD says: Since you eat meat with the blood still in it and look to your idols
and shed blood, should you then possess the land? 26 You rely
on your sword, you do detestable things, and each of you defiles his neighbor's
wife. Should you then possess the land?'
a)
Ezekiel's next message
has to do with rebuke another "common saying" among the Israelites at
this time. First,
let me discuss what this common saying was and then I'll discuss God's rebuke
of that saying in Verses 25-26.
b)
The idea behind this
saying is that when the Babylonians destroyed Jerusalem just about all of the Israelites
were take captive. However
at this moment in history, the Babylonian army left a small number of
Israelites to work the fields. (See 2nd Kings 25:11-12.)
i)
With that fact in their
mind, the Israelites who got to stay in that land thought the promise given to
Abraham that the Jewish people would inherit the land will be fulfilled through
those Israelites who were allowed to remain in the land.
ii)
In other words, God is
about to rebuke the notion that because He promised the land of Israel to the
descendants of Abraham, those few that remain in the land will get the promised
blessings of the land due to that promise given to Abraham.
c)
Now let's get to God's
rebuke: The
underlying principal is that yes, one day the Israelites will inherit the land
due to God's unconditional promises. At the same time, God will punish "his" if
they turn from Him and that is what the Israelites (collectively) have done at
this time. The
point is those still in the "land" are not the ones who start
God's unconditional promise about inheriting the land.
d)
In Verses 25-26 God
gives examples of disobedience to His laws. These issues listed are about eating meat without
draining the blood, (2) shedding of innocent blood, (3) killing innocent people
and (4) having sex with other's wives. The idea is not that this is a complete list of sins.
The idea is that God is giving examples
of the violations of His laws that have occurred and the necessity of
"cleaning out the land of His people".
e)
The point as it applies
to us is that God does hold us accountable for the rules He lays upon us.
It may not affect our salvation, but it
will definitely affect our lives as witnesses for Him.
The ultimate punishment is to no longer
be a living witness for God, which is the symbolic idea of being kicked out of
the Promised Land.
14.
Verse 27:
"Say this to them: `This is what the
Sovereign LORD says: As surely as I live, those who are left in the ruins will
fall by the sword, those out in the country I will give to the wild animals to
be devoured, and those in strongholds and caves will die of a plague. 28 I will
make the land a desolate waste, and her proud strength will come to an end, and
the mountains of Israel will become desolate so that no one will cross them. 29 Then
they will know that I am the LORD, when I have made the land a desolate waste
because of all the detestable things they have done.'
a)
God now addresses the
issue of those Israelites who are still left in the Promised Land.
God is saying these people will fall by
the sword or be killed by wild animals. God will fulfill His promise that the land will be a
total empty of His people for 70 years and even those Israelites that the
Babylonians left to farm the land will be killed.
b)
The point is not
that those who survived the siege were better people than those who did not.
The point is that the nation of Israel
was collectively guilty of turning from God and the whole nation had to be
punished to a point of banishment. God had to resort to this method of punishment as the
"only way" God could get the nation to turn from idolatry.
c)
That's the point of this
paragraph: The
land of Israel had to become totally devoid in order for future Israelites to
understand how seriously God expects those that follow Him to be obedient to
Him and no "mixed loyalty" is ever allowed.
15.
Verse 30:
"As for you, son of man, your
countrymen are talking together about you by the walls and at the doors of the
houses, saying to each other, `Come and hear the message that has come from the
LORD.' 31 My people come to you, as they usually do, and sit
before you to listen to your words, but they do not put them into practice.
With their mouths they express devotion, but their hearts are greedy for unjust
gain. 32 Indeed, to them you are nothing more than one who
sings love songs with a beautiful voice and plays an instrument well, for they
hear your words but do not put them into practice.
a)
The idea behind these
verses is that the Israelites in Babylon were willing to listen to Ezekiel
preach. It
became a form of entertainment. The problem was their heart was not in it and people
were not willing to really change their ways and follow God.
i)
The last sentence of
Verse 31 is a good summary of the problem. It says, "With their mouths they express
devotion, but their hearts are greedy for unjust gain".
b)
Let me give some modern
equivalents of this issue: It would be like an unmarried couple who were living
together but were still coming to church every week.
It would be like an unrepentant drunk or
drug abuser not willing to change their lifestyle, but like to hang around
church folks and "feel better for a short time".
It would be like somebody who steals, but
then goes to church to help alleviate the guilt.
i)
In other words, we're
back to the issue of a "changed heart". God is not interested so much in how we act around
other church folks, but how we act the rest of the week.
Is our hearts really given over to God?
This is the underlying question.
ii)
I should again stress
the idea of "perfection". God does expect that when we realize we sin to turn
against that sin and life a life pleasing to Him. We all make mistakes and that is not the issue of the
moment. The
issue is whether or not we have a desire to please God and we let our actions
follow that desire.
16.
Verse
33: "When
all this comes true--and it surely will--then they will know that a prophet has
been among them."
a)
Ezekiel
ends this chapter with a message from God that there will not be any true
repentance until all of this sinks in. In other
words, the Israelite people still haven't "gotten it" despite all of
the preaching from Ezekiel. It is going to take the 70 years
of captivity for the Israelites to realize they have turned from God.
b)
The
other idea of this sentence is that the Israelites still have not fully
accepted the idea that Ezekiel is a prophet of God and they won't accept it
until Ezekiel's predictions have come true. Remember
Ezekiel predicted not only the fall of Israel but the fall of all the powers
surrounding Israel as well.
17.
Chapter
34, Verse 1: The word of the LORD came to me:
2 "Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of
Israel; prophesy and say to them:
a)
Chapter 34 begins
another undated message.
b)
Verse 2 says this
message is to the "shepherds" of Israel.
OK, who are they?
i)
First
of all, it is not literally referring to those who are sheepherders. ☺
ii)
It
is a reference to the leaders of Israel. Scholars
debate whether or not it just refers to the civil leaders or both the civil and
religious leaders.
18.
Verse
2 (cont.): `This is what the Sovereign LORD says: Woe to the
shepherds of Israel who only take care of themselves! Should not shepherds take
care of the flock? 3 You eat the curds, clothe yourselves with the wool
and slaughter the choice animals, but you do not take care of the flock. 4 You have
not strengthened the weak or healed the sick or bound up the injured. You have
not brought back the strays or searched for the lost. You have ruled them
harshly and brutally. 5 So they were scattered because there was no shepherd,
and when they were scattered they became food for all the wild animals. 6 My sheep
wandered over all the mountains and on every high hill. They were scattered
over the whole earth, and no one searched or looked for them.
a)
The essential idea of
these verses is that the leaders of Israel only cared about taking care of themselves
and not the "common" people. Verse 2 says in effect these leaders ate
well and were well fed. At
the same time, God accuses these leaders of not taking care of their flock,
which are the people under their rule.
i)
The accusations include
not helping the weak or sick and ruling brutally.
ii)
The lack of good
leadership meant the Israelites were scattered with no one looking for them or
looking after them.
b)
It meant that God held
the leaders of Israel to a higher standard than the "every day"
people. It
may have meant that during the last few years when Israel faced the siege, the
leaders focused on saving themselves and didn't care about those under them.
c)
The
application ties to the title of this lesson. We are accountable to God for whatever position we are in. If we are called to be some sort of leader and take that position, God
holds us accountable to do our job and do it right.
i)
The
application doesn't just apply to civil leaders or religious leaders. It can be as apply to whatever role God has called us to do in our life.
ii)
A
point to get across is that we are all accountable in all aspects of our lives,
and not just life in our church settings. Yes we are
still saved if we are believing Christians and if we mess up in our leadership
roles. We can still suffer in this
lifetime or the next one for failing to do our duty in whatever God calls us to
do.
iii)
On
that happy note, I can move on to the next set of verses. ☺
19.
Verse
7: "`Therefore,
you shepherds, hear the word of the LORD: 8 As surely as I live,
declares the Sovereign LORD, because my flock lacks a shepherd and so has been
plundered and has become food for all the wild animals, and because my
shepherds did not search for my flock but cared for themselves rather than for
my flock, 9 therefore, O shepherds, hear the word of the LORD: 10 This is
what the Sovereign LORD says: I am against the shepherds and will hold them
accountable for my flock. I will remove them from tending the flock so that the
shepherds can no longer feed themselves. I will rescue my flock from their
mouths, and it will no longer be food for them.
a)
Before I get into the
punishment of these leaders, which is Verses 8 to 10, notice the
"power" behind the messenger. Ezekiel says, "Here the word of the LORD".
The idea is that God Himself has and will
ordain this punishment and it's not just Ezekiel's opinion.
b)
The
essential idea is God says He will punish these shepherds, hold them
accountable and God will remove them from being leaders.
c)
Remember
this is the Word of God. That means this principal still
applies today. Anybody called to any role of
leadership is held accountable to God for that role.
d)
The
second idea is that God will "rescue His flock from their mouths"
(Verse 10).
i)
The
idea is God protects those who are under him.
e)
I
made a conscious decision in this lesson to not overly-focus on what makes a
bad leader. I could spend half the lesson
describing false prophets and false-leaders in Israel then and the church
today. I have learned the best way to
spot a bad-leader is to focus on what God desires of a true leader.
f)
When
it comes to false teachers, it is like a point I teach every so often: The best way to spot counterfeit money is to spend time "playing
with" real money. In other words, the more time
one spends in God's word, the easier it is to spot a false teacher.
g)
Let
me give an example of dealing with a bad ruler: Let's say we are part of a group where the leader is not what he or she
"should be". Let's also say that we prayed
about it and God has made it clear that despite the difficulty, God wants us to
stay in that situation. My point is we have to remember
that we belong to "God's flock" and not "that flock". We have to trust that somehow, someway, God will rescue us out of that
situation. It may not happen until we are
resurrected, or it may happen in our lifetime.
i)
Along
the same line of thinking, nobody on this e-mail list belongs to me. Assuming you are saved, you are part of God's flock and not my flock. I never get upset when people quit this e-mail list.
h)
My
point is if God calls us to lead, then He will also guide those are to follow. One way to know if God calls you to lead is to see who follows. If somebody wants "out" of your leadership and can legally do
so, it is best to let them go and say that it was not meant to be. If they are friends, obviously one can talk about it and find out their
reasons.
20.
Verse
11: "
`For this is what the Sovereign LORD says: I myself will search for my sheep
and look after them. 12 As a shepherd looks after his scattered flock when he
is with them, so will I look after my sheep. I will rescue them from all the
places where they were scattered on a day of clouds and darkness.
a)
In Verse 11, the focus
shifts from the problem to the solution. The problem for the Israelites is they suffered from
bad leadership. Again,
this could refer to the civil leaders as well as the religious leaders and it
could also apply to false prophets.
b)
The solution is
"God Himself" will look after his sheep.
It means that God Himself will rescue
"His sheep" from the places they are scattered.
c)
Let's talk a little
about what that means both then and now.
i)
For
starters, it refers to the fact that God will gather Israel again as a nation
from the places they were scattered after next seventy years.
ii)
It
means that despite the fact the nation of Israel has ended and the people are
now scattered through the Babylonian Empire, God will bring them back again.
iii)
Don't
take that lightly. In the history of civilization,
Israel may be the only nation to be scattered and then comes back together again
as a nation. It happened to that nation
twice. If you ever want proof that the
bible is the Word of God, think about the Nation of Israel. The Hebrew language is the only language in world history ever to be a
dead language and then come back into daily use.
d)
Every
so often I make the point that bible predictions often have double
fulfillments.
i)
What
I mean by that is often the bible makes a prediction where there is a short
term fulfillment of that prediction and a long-term fulfillment of that
prediction.
ii)
The
short term fulfillment helps to validate the speaker as a prophet of God.
iii)
The
long term fulfillment is often the key point that God wants to make and helps
us see the ultimate fulfillment of such prophecies.
iv)
I
state that here because the 20th Century existence of Israel is a fulfilled
long term fulfillment. We will discuss the issue of
modern Israel more in future lessons.
e)
So
what is the "long term" fulfillment of this prophesy? Let's state what it is again: It is the
fact that God Himself will lead His people.
i)
One
can interpret that as being about the modern state of Israel and the fact that
Jews from all over the world are being gathered there.
ii)
One
can interpret it as a future day when the Messiah (Jesus) will rule the world
from Jerusalem. More on that idea in a moment.
iii)
It
can also apply to Christians as well. The
essential idea is that we are led by God to run our lives. For us, that means studying one's bible for guidance as how one should
live. In that sense, through prayer and studying, God is our
leader in deciding how we should live our lives.
21.
Verse 13: I will bring
them out from the nations and gather them from the countries, and I will bring
them into their own land. I will pasture them on the mountains of Israel, in
the ravines and in all the settlements in the land. 14 I will
tend them in a good pasture, and the mountain heights of Israel will be their
grazing land. There they will lie down in good grazing land, and there they
will feed in a rich pasture on the mountains of Israel. 15 I myself
will tend my sheep and have them lie down, declares the Sovereign LORD. 16 I will
search for the lost and bring back the strays. I will bind up the injured and
strengthen the weak, but the sleek and the strong I will destroy. I will
shepherd the flock with justice.
a)
Verses 13-16 give more
details along this same prophecy.
b)
The verses say God will
gather the Israelites from all the places they have been scattered and God
himself will take care of them.
c)
For those of you
familiar with Psalm 23, it begins with "The Lord is My Shepherd".
In a sense, these verses are very similar
to that Psalm line. The
idea is to acknowledge that God exists, He controls the universe, and He wants
to be in charge of our lives. Once we understand that, we give our lives to Him and let
Him (Jesus as God) take care of our sins. The rest of our lives are then all about living a life
pleasing to God. The
idea of God guiding us can be expressed with the idea that the "Lord is My
Shepherd".
d)
This text does not mean
that if we trust in God, no bad thing will ever happen to us.
Nowhere does the bible promise our lives
will be perfect and only full of good moments if we trust God at all times.
If that were true, people would give
their lives to God only to avoid the bad things of life!
What it means is God will guide us
through such times. I
like the line "God provides a rescue rope to pull us through tough
times".
e)
Verse 17 says that God
will destroy the "sleek and strong". I'll explain that at Verse 20 when the text explains
the fate of bad leaders.
22.
Verse
17: "
`As for you, my flock, this is what the Sovereign LORD says: I will judge
between one sheep and another, and between rams and goats. 18 Is it
not enough for you to feed on the good pasture? Must you also trample the rest
of your pasture with your feet? Is it not enough for you to drink clear water?
Must you also muddy the rest with your feet? 19 Must my
flock feed on what you have trampled and drink what you have muddied with your
feet?
a)
OK,
with the good news of God acknowledging He is guiding us, comes the bad news
that we still have to deal with judgment. I don't mean
judgment in terms of salvation, but judgment in terms of our eternal rewards
based on our faithfulness to whatever roles God has called us to and whatever
gifts He has given us. These three verses are not
talking about salvation, but about judgment of our lifestyle. Again, the price one pays for following God is that He judges our
lifestyles and constantly guides us through prayer, through His word and
through Spiritual guidance on how to live.
b)
With
that out of my system, ☺ let me explain these verses: The biblical idea of having one's "feet dirty" is about being
saved but still needing to be regularly cleansed from sin.
i)
If
you recall the story of Jesus washing the disciples feet, Jesus made the point
that the whole body is cleaned, but only the feet need to be washed. (John
13:10). Jesus' point was not that
bathing was unnecessary. ☺ The point is that if we "cleansed" of all our
sins by Jesus, we still need to deal with the sins we commit in our life as we
still walk in this world. That is a reason why Jesus
washed His disciples' feet and told them to do likewise.
ii)
That
principal does tie to these verses. In these
verses here in Ezekiel, God is stating that He provides the Israelites with
clean water. Then God says, "Must you
dirty up the water with one's dirty feat?" The point has nothing to do with washing. It is about getting "dirty" by being involved in the sins of
the world.
c)
This
leads me back to the first verse in this paragraph. God says He will judge between one sheep and another. I believe the main
point is for those who are saved, God is talking about how we live our lives
will be judged by Him and our status or rewards in heaven are determined based
on how we lives our lives for God. The point is
God is judging individual sheep and He means us!
i)
The
second reference is that God will judge between "rams and goats". It could be a reference to judging the Gentiles or it could be a
reference to judging between those who are saved and those who are not. The main point of this is God is going to judge His "sheep"
which are believers.
d)
This
ties to "leadership and accountability". If we choose to be led by God, then we are to be accountable to His
leadership as well!
23.
Verse
20: "
`Therefore this is what the Sovereign LORD says to them: See, I myself will
judge between the fat sheep and the lean sheep. 21 Because
you shove with flank and shoulder, butting all the weak sheep with your horns
until you have driven them away, 22 I will save my flock, and they will no longer be
plundered. I will judge between one sheep and another. 23 I will
place over them one shepherd, my servant David, and he will tend them; he will
tend them and be their shepherd. 24 I the LORD will be their God, and my servant David
will be prince among them. I the LORD have spoken.
a)
Now the message is back
to the leaders in Israel. God
says He will judge between the fat sheep and the lean sheep, referring to the
leaders and the people of Israel. If you recall from early in this lesson, God was
accusing the leaders in Israel of taking care of themselves and not the
"average citizen" in Israel.
b)
I regularly like to pray
for the leaders over me. That
includes the ones I did vote for as much as the ones I did not vote for.
In days when I am mad at my government
for passing laws I don't like, I have to remember verses like this.
I have to remember that my civil leaders
are accountable to God whether or not they realize it.
God will take care of judging both good
and bad leaders. Meanwhile,
let's back to the text itself. ☺
c)
God
is specifically condemning the leaders of Israel for how they have treated the
people. God compares the leaders to
animals with horns and the fact those leaders have used their horns to
"push away" the people.
i)
Again,
the text emphasizes how God will judge between one sheep and another. The point is we are all going to be judged by God based on what roles
(and status) we had in life and how we used those roles as we led or followed.
d)
This
leads to Verse 23 and 24. In these verses, God promises
that He will appoint David to be their leader. King David lived several hundred years prior to Ezekiel. King David was thought of as the greatest king in the history of Israel. The verses say that God will rule over His people and David will be God's
"prince".
i)
To
understand this, first, one has to remember that the promise of a Messiah to
rule the world was given to King David. Back in 2nd
Samuel Chapter 7, a promise was made to David that a descendant of his would
rule forever. It is a reference of the Messiah
to come. Jesus was a descendant of David
both from His mother and His father's side. 2nd Samuel,
Chapter 7, Verse 14 says this descendant of David will be "God's
son". (It is a hint of the divine
origin of the Messiah.)
ii)
One
can then interpret this as the Messiah ruling the world one day from Jerusalem. Remember that Ezekiel in a sense is done condemning all of Israel and is
mainly focusing on God's future promises. One promise
is that God Himself will rule over the people and the descendant of David will
be "God's son".
iii)
There
are other interpretations of this verse too. Because the
text says that "David Himself" will be a prince among them, there are
some who think that when the "millennial kingdom comes" (a 1,000 year
period where the Messiah (Jesus) rules the world from Jerusalem) that David
himself will be in charge of Israel.
a)
When
we get to chapters 40-48 of Ezekiel, we will discuss in detail the Messiah
ruling from Jerusalem. That text also speaks of a
"local prince" and some suspect it is David himself. More on that in later chapters.
24.
Verse
25: "
`I will make a covenant of peace with them and rid the land of wild beasts so
that they may live in the desert and sleep in the forests in safety. 26 I will
bless them and the places surrounding my hill. I will send down showers in
season; there will be showers of blessing. 27 The trees of the field
will yield their fruit and the ground will yield its crops; the people will be
secure in their land. They will know that I am the LORD, when I break the bars
of their yoke and rescue them from the hands of those who enslaved them. 28 They
will no longer be plundered by the nations, nor will wild animals devour them.
They will live in safety, and no one will make them afraid. 29 I will
provide for them a land renowned for its crops, and they will no longer be
victims of famine in the land or bear the scorn of the nations. 30 Then
they will know that I, the LORD their God, am with them and that they, the
house of Israel, are my people, declares the Sovereign LORD. 31 You my
sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are people, and I am your God, declares the
Sovereign LORD.' "
a)
In
these final verses, we are still talking about a future day when God rules over
Israel. Here we get some details of what
will happen whenever that time comes:
i)
Verse
25 says that God will rid the land of wild beasts.
ii)
Verse
26 says there will be plenty of rain. One has to
remember that Israel is a dry climate and seasonal rain is a good thing. This also shows that during the millennium, people will still have to eat
food.
iii)
Verse
28 teaches how they will not be enslaved anymore. One has to remember that after the 70 year period, Israel became part of
the Medo-Persian Empire, then the Greek Empire and then the Roman Empire. My point here is that this paragraph in Ezekiel is not describing any
time in Israel's past history.
iv)
The
last part of Verse 28 says "no one will make them afraid". Further, in Verse 29, it says that Israel "will no longer bear the
scorn of the nations". That means that whenever this
time period is, Israel will not have to worry about enemies.
v)
My
point here is that whatever Ezekiel is describing is not describing modern
Israel prior to Jesus ruling. If you know anything about
modern Israel, is that they have had to deal with enemies consistently since
the nation was formed.
b)
The
point I'm getting at here is Ezekiel is teaching of a future day "to
us" as well as to those living in Ezekiel's time. There will come a time when the Israelites live in peace from their
surrounding enemies and the Messiah will rule the world from Israel.
c)
As
I stated earlier, bible prophecy often deal in double-fulfillments. In other words, some of what Ezekiel predicted came true after the 70
years of captivity. Some of it came true when the
modern state of Israel was born. All of it
will come true when the Messiah rules the world one day from Israel. When is that day? Only God the Father knows.
d)
Last
thing and I'll wrap it up. There are many Christians who
don't believe in a literal 1,000-year period where Jesus will rule the world
from Israel. There are many Christians who
believe that modern Israel has nothing to do with God's predictions about Jesus
ruling the world one day. This is called the
"amillennial view" (i.e., no literal millennium). This view tends to spiritualize verses like this and believes that it is
only talking about God ruling in our hearts and nothing more than that.
i)
Do
I think that Christians who hold that view are going to hell? No, in the sense that our salvation is based only on our trust of Jesus
paying the price for our sins and nothing more. At the same time, this lesson is about "accountability" to
God's leadership. I would much rather take the
text literally than to spiritualize it!
ii)
I
have a hard time denying the literalness of the text! As we get into the next few lessons, we'll read much more about a literal
time when Jesus rules the earth.
25.
I
promised myself after last week's marathon lesson, to keep this one to about 12
pages. I came close, but I still ran a
little long. ☺ With that said, I'll end it
here and now.
26.
Let's
pray: Father, help us to remember that You and You alone are
in charge of our lives. Help us to live a life pleasing
to you in all that we do. We pray for our civil and
spiritual leaders over us. Help them to make decisions
pleasing to You and lead them so we can live a life pleasing to You in all that
we do. Help us to remember that You are
in charge of them as well as us. Guide us, as
you are our "Good Shepherd", in Jesus name we pray, Amen.