2nd Kings Chapters 15-16 – John Karmelich
1.
My
title for this lesson is "Why we should care about God's Judgment". An alternative title is "I'm saved, but can anyone tell?" I admit, when I think of God's judgment, I picture a person standing on a
busy street corner wearing a big sandwich sign that says, "Repent,
judgment day is coming". That person then hands out
tracts to anyone willing to take them. The good
news is the focus of this lesson is not on that type of eternal judgment. It is about how God judges people, as we live out our lives. It's about why we should care about His judgment and what to do about it. If that doesn't scare you away from reading this lesson, I'm guessing
nothing will.
a)
To
explain this better, let me summarize the whole lesson in a few quick thoughts. These two chapters go back and forth between what is happening in the
Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Kingdom of Judah roughly between
700-800 BC. To put it simply the kings who
reign in the North for the most part don't live very long as God is judging
each of them for being bad kings. This will
lead us well into the next lesson, as we'll read of the fall of the Northern
Kingdom. As to the Southern Kingdom they
have their own judgment issues as well. Their kings
reign much longer as they're mostly trusting in God and He blesses them with
long reigns. However, we have some bad eggs
there as well.
b)
OK
John, so a bunch of kings who lived long ago lived and died. The bad ones died by being killed for being disobedient to God and the
good ones get to live a long time. This is
getting old and we get the idea that God is judging them based on how they
ruled over His people. Why should I read further? So glad you asked.
i)
As
I love to state, the purpose of studying one's bible is not to memorize
history. It is to learn how it applies to
our lives. In this case it is not to state,
"Hey too bad for you kings. You
disobeyed God and here comes the consequences". The point is to remind ourselves that we too can pay a major price for
disobedience to God. No it is not about losing our
salvation, but losing our opportunities to be a good witness for Him. More importantly, God does not want us to live in our own little worlds.
He wants us in effect to be like one of the prophets and be witnesses to others
how trusting in God helps us to live the type of life He desires of us.
ii)
Let
me try this another way: The great commission that Jesus
gave to us is for all of us to go out in the world and make disciples of people
from all nations. Also in the book of Revelation,
Jesus refers to all believers as a "kingdom of priests" (from
Revelation 5:10). The point is not that all
Christians have to wear special robes or "priestly collars". God only calls a small percentage of people into the professional ministry. Most of us God calls to be a witness for Him in our daily lives. That just means that we live differently enough that we are a good
witness for Jesus and are willing to share His grace with others around us.
iii)
Coming
back to the lesson title as we read about these bad kings, God is telling us
not only to not live like them, but to be live a little like the prophets
mentioned in this book. In other words if we are saved,
we use our time to be a witness for Him in our daily lives. Yes of course we still have to earn a living and still need to take care
of our own needs. That's not the issue. It is in effect, "If we are saved, can any body tell? Are we leading other people closer to Him? Are we a witness for God or just someone strictly using our time in order
to benefit our own lives?"
c)
Yes,
all of that makes us feel guilty. It's not a
matter of "We have to do more". It's asking
if we are doing what God has called us to do. As I also love to state, the most valuable we each own is our time. The question comes down to how are we using our time. When we look back at our lives, do we want to say we made a difference? Again the issue is not the size our ministry, but if we were loyal to
what God called us to do. In other words did we act like
the "priests" that Jesus called us to be. That's the judgment that we each must face.
2.
Ok
John now that you've made us all feel guilty for not doing enough, what does
any of this have to do with this chapter? First, let
go of the guilt. You can't change your past. All you can do is consider how to use whatever time we have left to make
a difference for God.
a)
As
to the text in this lesson, as you read about the problems and the mistakes
that each of these kings made, don't think, "Oh well, too bad for
him." Consider how they choose to live
out their lives and think, "What can I learn from them? What can I learn from those mistakes as to be a good witness for God? That's what we read our bibles in the first place and hopefully that's
what you'll get from studying this lesson.
b)
With
that said, time for us to put on our "sandwich board" that reads
judgment is coming and each need to consider our own lives and how we are using
them to make a difference for God with our lives. With that said, I'm ready to start the verse by verse comments.
3.
Chapter
15, Verse 1: In the twenty-seventh year of Jeroboam king of Israel,
Azariah son of Amaziah king of Judah began to reign. 2 He was
sixteen years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem fifty-two
years. His mother's name was Jecoliah; she was from Jerusalem. 3He did
what was right in the eyes of the LORD, just as his father Amaziah had done. 4 The high
places, however, were not removed; the people continued to offer sacrifices and
burn incense there.
a)
Our story here begins
with in the Northern Kingdom of Israel. Since I have new people join every week, time for the
two sentence summary here: Israel at this point in its history was split into two
kingdoms. The
north one was called Israel and the southern one was called Judah.
So unless I am referring to all the
Israelites, when I say "Israel" here, know that I'm just referring to
the Northern Kingdom. What
is even more confusing is the text marks time by the reign of the opposite
kingdom in this book. For
example Verse 1 says that in the 27th year of the king of the Northern Kingdom
of Israel, that marks the start of the next king of Judah.
The good news is I don't push you to
remember names or dates. What
I am interested in is learning what God wants us to know about these kings.
b)
Speaking of which, this
latest king of the south reigned for 52 years. Given the fact that he did rule that long is generally
a good sign that God is blessing his reign. This king's name is Azariah and he was also known as
"Uzziah" in other references. In case you care, Isaiah began his ministry
effectively when this king died as a cross-reference.
The text also says he had a
"godly" mother by mentioning in Verse 2 that his mother was from
Jerusalem. A
key point of these verses is simply that this king of the south lived a life
pleasing to God.
i)
Here comes the
"but". The
king still tolerated Israelites worshipping God any old way they felt like it.
To recap briefly from the last lesson,
God wanted Israelites to worship Him by using the system of priests that God
set up centuries earlier. But
instead of going to the official temple to seek God, the Israelites were
seeking God "however and wherever they wanted to".
A rough equivalent is to say, I'm going
to ignore going to church and just spend a few minutes pray by myself and call
it a week. God
desires accountability to fellow believers, which is why He encourages us to go
to church in the first place. The point is that if we just think "I'm saved, I
can go live however I want", then we are just focusing on ourselves and ignoring
the lives of others around us. That is the warning of these verses and of course the
main theme of this lesson.
c)
Let's focus on the good
news for the moment. This
king was for the most part given high marks in Verse 3.
The text said he "did what was
right", which probably means he sought God with his life and encouraged
the people living in his kingdom to seek God as well.
i)
The companion chapter to
this one is 2nd Chronicles Chapter 26. We learn there that this king invented things to help
in warfare. He
won battles. The
reason that God judged him is that wanted to be a priest as well as a king.
Ever since the time of Moses, God
ordained that Jewish priests and the civil leaders (think kings) were to be
separate offices and no one was allowed to do both.
ii)
Speaking of Moses, I
always found it interesting that God picked Moses brother to be the first top
priest. If
you read about the life of Moses' brother Aaron he was far from perfect to put
it mildly. Still
God called Aaron to be the first Jewish priest. By ordaining two brothers to be
in charge, it sort of says, "Each office is to be separate, but each is to
depend upon the other as both are brothers".
iii)
Bringing that into
modern times, I can think of two prominent Christian leaders of the 20th
century who have both made statements effectively saying that the worst mistake
they made was getting into politics. My point is those that God has called into the
professional ministry is also who he has not called into politics and
vice-versa. I'm
not saying those in the professional ministry can't vote.
I'm saying that if God gives one the
privilege of being a spiritual leader or a civil leader, focus on doing that
job well and don't seek both offices for themselves.
iv)
The reason I bring all
that up leads us back to this king. In 2nd Chronicles 26, we read that this king offered
incense as the top priest was supposed to do. Despite the fact he was generally a good king, God
held that king accountable as he should have known better.
God then struck that king with the horrible
disease of leprosy for the remainder of his life. With that understood, Verse 5 makes more sense:
4.
Verse 5:
The LORD afflicted the king with leprosy
until the day he died, and he lived in a separ-ate house. Jotham the king's son
had charge of the palace and governed the people of the land.
a)
John's loose
translation: Because
of what this king did late in his reign, his son did most of the work around
the palace while the king was still alive, but suffered from leprosy.
b)
With that said, let me
come back to God's judgment. As we will read later in this chapter about the kings
of the Northern Kingdom, they mostly reigned short time periods.
God judged them each for failing to do
what He desired of them. Yet
here with this good king in the South who got to reign 52 years, the text just
focuses on the one major mistake that king made in his life, which was when he
wanted to act like a priest and not just a king.
c)
My question is why was
God so tough for this one act? To state the obvious, until Jesus rules over us as
both our high priest and as God, God the Father wanted separate roles for both
priests and civil leaders. That way there is no central concentration of power in
any one person. If
this king was generally a good one, why bring up his one big fault and not the
good that he did? It
is because this text focuses on God's judgment for disobedience.
i)
Let's apply this to us:
Let's say for the most part we do what's
right and say go to church regularly. We seek God and trust Him to guide our lives.
Still, give that we are human we make
mistakes. The
point is God does not judge us on a curve. We don't go to heaven and God say, "Your good
deeds outweigh your bad deeds". That's why we can only be saved through Jesus complete
sin payment. Once
we get that, God calls us to live out our lives to make a difference for Him.
Of course He is aware of the good we do
and He can consider us a "good egg". But when we mess up, He loves us too much to let us
get away with sin. When
we are called to positions of leadership we are now even more accountable for
our actions.
ii)
My point here is simply
that if one desires one day to have some sort of power in this world, be it a
civil leader or a religious leader, that leadership comes with the cost of
accountability. That's
also why in the New Testament, James warns us that we should not desire to be
teachers without realizing the cost. (See James 3:1.)
d)
Coming back the verse,
the point is we learn this king was judged for what he did wrong as to fit in
with the theme of this section of the book. Yes he did good things as stated in 2nd Chronicles.
The point to learn here is when we are
called into positions of leadership in the ministry or in say the government or
even the business world, God can and does judge us by His standards of how He
has called us to live. That
is He desires that we be a good witness for Him in the world.
In other words we don't avoid sin in
order to be more saved. We
avoid sin as that is how we are called to be a witness for Him.
5.
Verse
6: As
for the other events of Azariah's reign, and all he did, are they not written
in the book of the annals of the kings of Judah? 7 Azariah
rested with his fathers and was buried near them in the City of David. And
Jotham his son succeeded him as king.
a)
To restate what is
quickly becoming one of my running jokes through these lessons, "If one
wanted to learn more about these kings, when this book was put together, one
could go study more about each king. In other words, "Go to the library to study more
about him or in today's world, Google him." My point is the book of kings is not here for us to
learn the entire life's story of each of these kings.
It is to show how God works in our lives
with the kings of Israel (and Judah) as examples of how we are, and how not to
act.
b)
With that disclaimer
stated, the next king is named Jotham and he reigned here.
c)
Here's an interesting
bit of trivia to consider: If one studies the history of the Northern Kingdom of
Israel, there were eight family dynasties that reigned as kings.
The Southern Kingdom of Judah lasted over
hundred years longer and all of that time, there was only one family dynasty:
The descendants of King of David.
It shows how God kept His word to David
despite centuries of war, fights, famines, and some pretty bad egg as kings.
The point for you and me is despite the
fact that we can be judged for turning from God the reward for serving God are
eternal despite whatever happens in the meantime. In other words, all of this effort to use our time to
make a difference for God is worth it in this life let alone the next life.
d)
In the meantime, it is
time to switch scenes back to the Northern Kingdom and the latest bad egg of
the moment:
6.
Verse 8:
In the thirty-eighth year of Azariah king
of Judah, Zechariah son of Jeroboam became king of Israel in Samaria, and he
reigned six months. 9 He did evil in the eyes of the LORD, as his fathers
had done. He did not turn away from the sins of Jeroboam son of Nebat, which he
had caused Israel to commit.
a)
Remember from Verse 2 of
this chapter the king reigned for 52 years. The latest king of the Northern Kingdom reigned six
months. Personally
to live as a king for 52 years seems like a much better "gig" than to
only reign six months. That
fact alone is a good sign that God is judging the Northern Kings based on how
they acted.
b)
In effect the only thing
stated about this king is that he was a "bad egg".
He turned the residents of that kingdom
away from God just like the first king of that nation did.
That is why the only thing we really need
to know about this king was that he was displeasing to God and therefore, was
judged after only a short time on the throne. But John, didn't his father who was also a "bad
egg" reign a lot longer? Yes, and that's the point too.
The son should have learned from his
father and because he didn't, he suffered the consequences.
The point for you and me is God judges us
based on what information we do have about Him. The price of being a bible knowing Christian is God
now holds us accountable for the information we do know about Him.
On that scary thought, time to move on.
7.
Verse
10: Shallum
son of Jabesh conspired against Zechariah. He attacked him in front of the
people, assassinated him and succeeded him as king. 11 The
other events of Zechariah's reign are written in the book of the annals of the
kings of Israel. 12 So the word of the LORD spoken to Jehu was fulfilled:
"Your descendants will sit on the throne of Israel to the fourth
generation."
a)
First I need to say that
this six month reigning king named Zechariah is not the same guy as the prophet
named Zechariah. Whether
you realize it or not, there are bunch of guys in the bible with that name.
However, this Zechariah is the great
grandson of a king named Jehu. God promised Jehu some chapters back that his
descendants would reign for four generations. With that said, I wondered if Zechariah thought much
about that prophesy. Did
he worry his reign would end soon or did he even think about God much?
My guess is that because he only reigned
six months, he didn't give God much thought. That's why God punished him by giving him such a short
reign. The
point to learn is that judgment is not just about possibly going to hell.
It's about being a good witness for Him.
8.
Verse
13: Shallum
son of Jabesh became king in the thirty-ninth year of Uzziah king of Judah, and
he reigned in Samaria one month. 14 Then Menahem son of Gadi went from Tirzah up to
Samaria. He attacked Shallum son of Jabesh in Samaria, assassinated him and
succeeded him as king.
a)
Well if you think the
last king displeased God, the guy who killed him is no better.
It is stated in Verse 13 that this next
king only reigned one month. The background on this king is that he was from
another city in Northern Israel (Tirzah) and he successfully led a plot to kill
the last king and became king himself.
b)
There are actually
records found by the Assyrian Empire (more on them coming up) that refers to
this king. They
refer to this guy in effect as a "son of a nobody".
My point being is just that we have
nonbiblical records that confirm the book of Kings as historically true.
c)
Short version:
Another bad king.
God judges him and he only reigns a
month. With
that said, we read of the end of his reign in the next verse.
9.
Verse
15: The
other events of Shallum's reign, and the conspiracy he led, are written in the
book of the annals of the kings of Israel.
a)
Again
we get the "Go to the official library (that existed back then) if you
want to learn more about this king during his brief reign. OK, enough of that "loser" of a king. Time for us to read about the next bad egg.
10.
Verse
16: At
that time Menahem, starting out from Tirzah, attacked Tiphsah and everyone in
the city and its vicinity, because they refused to open their gates. He sacked
Tiphsah and ripped open all the pregnant women. 17 In the
thirty-ninth year of Azariah king of Judah, Menahem son of Gadi became king of
Israel, and he reigned in Samaria ten years. 18 He did
evil in the eyes of the LORD. During his entire reign he did not turn away from
the sins of Jeroboam son of Nebat, which he had caused Israel to commit.
a)
Let me
"translate" this in simple terms. The next king to be, made his point that he is in
charge, by killing pregnant women as a sign that he is not to be messed with as
a king to be. He
killed the current bad king of the moment. God considered him another bad egg, and this guy
reigned for 10 years. During
that time, he was no better than the first of the kings of the North as when he
reigned, he turned the Israelites away from God.
b)
Bottom line is God
judged this guy for being a bad king. He reigned a relatively short time and I suspect he is
in hell not only for killing the pregnant women, but as one raised up to a
position of leadership, he made the fateful decision to not seek God during all
of the time that this king was raised up by God to be the leader.
The joke is, "And you think the
current leader of your country/city/church or business is bad news?
Imagine living under this guy."
Not only does he turn people away from
God, but he murders innocent pregnant women in order to achieve that power.
c)
The sad news is we are
not done with this king. We
are going to read of the strange way that God effectively judges him based on
how he lived his life.
11.
Verse 19:
Then Pul king of Assyria invaded the
land, and Menahem gave him a thousand talents of silver to gain his support and
strengthen his own hold on the kingdom. 20 Menahem exacted this
money from Israel. Every wealthy man had to contribute fifty shekels of silver
to be given to the king of Assyria. So the king of Assyria withdrew and stayed
in the land no longer.
a)
To explain this, I need
to give a little ancient history of empires in the Middle East.
The short version is the first great
empire that conquered over much of Israel is the Assyrian Empire.
Think of it as centered in Northern Iran.
It covered most of what we know today as
both Iran and Iraq and other areas. This empire was eventually conquered by
what we call the Babylonian Empire based out of "Iraq" today.
That empire was eventually taken over by
the Medo-Persian empire that stretched from "Turkey to India" and
based out of Iran. That
empire was eventually conquered by Alexander the Great and the Greeks.
The final great empire was the Romans,
who's territory was far greater and it literally did last for a millennium.
My point is the Assyrian Empire enters
the scene in these verses.
b)
That leads us back to
the "bad egg of a king" of the moment. That king of Israel bought off the Assyrian Empire by
giving that Empire lots of silver and requiring any Israelite with money to pay
a fine to that king. In
effect, this is the beginning of the end of the Northern Kingdom.
Now they are effectively servants of this
empire. The
official end of the Northern Kingdom will come in Chapter 17.
It starts here with the king agreeing to
be subject to subject to that great empire that lasted over a century.
c)
The point for you and me
is that the king of the moment gets judged by God not by him losing his life
immediately, but by making all of Israel suffer for turning away from God.
But why does all of Israel have to suffer
because of this bad king? The
answer is that we suffer due to the decisions of our leaders.
The king turned from God and then God let
the latest empire of the moment grow over His people as we read in these
verses. My
point is judgment in this life is not always death.
Sometimes it is worse as God allows bad
stuff to happen as to say in effect, "You ignore Me?
Great here are the consequences".
12.
Verse 21:
As for the other events of Menahem's
reign, and all he did, are they not written in the book of the annals of the
kings of Israel? 22 Menahem rested with his fathers. And Pekahiah his son
succeeded him as king.
a)
These verses say in
effect, all you need to know about the king of the moment is that he made the
decision to turn from God and therefore God turned from him.
That's why God allowed the Assyrian
Empire to be in charge of Northern Kingdom of Israel at this time.
Still, the Assyrian Empire didn't empty
Israel just yet. The
son of this bad king is named in Verse 22 (Pekahiah) and he is the next
"bad egg" in Israel to reign and be judged.
13.
Verse 23:
In the fiftieth year of Azariah king of
Judah, Pekahiah son of Menahem became king of Israel in Samaria, and he reigned
two years. 24 Pekahiah did evil in the eyes of the LORD. He did not
turn away from the sins of Jeroboam son of Nebat, which he had caused Israel to
commit. 25One of his chief officers, Pekah son of Remaliah,
conspired against him. Taking fifty men of Gilead with him, he assassinated
Pekahiah, along with Argob and Arieh, in the citadel of the royal palace at
Samaria. So Pekah killed Pekahiah and succeeded him as king.
26 The other events of Pekahiah's reign, and all he did,
are written in the book of the annals of the kings of Israel.
a)
The first thing one may
think as one glaces at this paragraph is that this is a whole bunch of names of
people I can't pronounce. Let
me make it simple: The
latest bad king of the Northern Kingdom is named Pekahiah.
He only reigned two years. God was angry
as the king had turned the Israelites away from serving Him.
After two years, an officer of the king
named Pekah killed the king. The rest as they say is the details.
b)
So is that all we need
to know? This
guy messed up and God gave him a short leash? In effect yes. This leads me back how God's judgment works.
The scary thing about being a devout
believer in God is that we are held accountable for the positions God raises us
up to in life. This
king of the moment was killed by an another king who in effect became a subject
of a large empire. You
would think King Pekaiah (say that three times fast) would think, OK as king
I'm now subject this foreign "Iranian" empire.
Maybe I should seek the true God and He
would rescue us from them. Of course he didn't and in effect that's what caused
him to lose his job let alone his life. The lesson to us is God takes whatever role we are
given to serve Him seriously. If we have a small role and would like a bigger one,
be faithful in that service and then and only then will God raise you up over
time.
c)
In the meantime, it's
time to read about the next bad of the North:
14.
Verse 27:
In the fifty-second year of Azariah king
of Judah, Pekah son of Remaliah became king of Israel in Samaria, and he
reigned twenty years. 28 He did evil in the eyes of the LORD. He did not turn
away from the sins of Jeroboam son of Nebat, which he had caused Israel to
commit.
a)
The next "bad
king" is named Pekah. He is the one who killed Pekahiah.
This loser got to reign for 20 years.
OK, why should I care?
One of the big themes of the book of
Kings is how God's judgment grows worse and worse (or stronger and stronger) as
his people continue to turn away from Him. We'll read an example of that in the next few verses.
15.
Verse 29:
In the time of Pekah king of Israel,
Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria came and took Ijon, Abel Beth Maacah, Janoah,
Kedesh and Hazor. He took Gilead and Galilee, including all the land of
Naphtali, and deported the people to Assyria. 30 Then
Hoshea son of Elah conspired against Pekah son of Remaliah. He attacked and
assassinated him, and then succeeded him as king in the twentieth year of
Jotham son of Uzziah. 31 As for the other events of Pekah's reign, and all he
did, are they not written in the book of the annals of the kings of Israel?
a)
My
point #1 here: Don't panic over all of these
names.
b)
My
point #2 here: Understand the fact that when we
make the conscious choice to turn from God's desire for our lives, there are
consequences.
c)
There
I just described the whole lesson with two simple points.
d)
Here
are the details of the moment. The large growing empire in that
region at that time was called the Assyrian Empire. In effect, God has said to the Northern Nation of Israel, I've had it you
people. I've been patient for centuries
hoping a good king would come on the scene and lead you people back to Me. I've sent prophet after prophet as a sign that I am here and I want to
lead you. (Remember Elijah and Elisha? Two prime examples.) I have let person after person
become the next king hoping they would lead the Israelites back to Me (God). Since you as a nation have grown worse and worse, the most merciful thing
I can do is bring this kingdom to an end, which happens in Chapter 17. Here in this chapter, we get the "start of that end" as parts
of the Northern Kingdom were now part of the Assyrian Empire, and the
Israelites who lived there we deported to other parts of that large empire.
i)
The
things to get out of this lesson is 1) God is patient with us and 2) Even He
has His limits of how much He will tolerate of us turning from Him. That in effect is what God's judgment is all about: Not the eternal type, but the consequences of failing to be a good
witness for Him. We can be punished either
individually or as a group or even as a nation if we say we have committed our
lives to serving Him and then turn from that commitment. Is that scary? Just ask the Israelites living
at that time who then were deported as they were captured by the Assyrian
Empire.
ii)
So
you know, it was common for millenniums that when one group of people are
captured by another it was common practice to split them up as that way it is
less likely they get together to plan a rebellion against that empire. That is why when the Assyrians captured an area, they split up the people
living there. In effect that is a preview of
the fall of this nation in Chapter 17 and the inevitable fall of the Southern
Kingdom near the end of the book of Kings.
iii)
Bottom
line is "Kings" is a tragic story of what happens to anyone who make
a commitment to trust in God and then fails to live up to that commitment. That's a good summary of the judgment of this lesson and the consequences
of turning from God in our lives. OK, enough
guilt, back to the text.
e)
The
short version of these verses, is that the Israelites living in the Northern
Kingdom at that time were angry that their kingdom was getting smaller due to
the successful attacks by the Assyrians so the king of the moment was killed. Yes I can give you more details about the life of the king, but the main
thing to get is that this king failed to trust in God as did the Israelites
living there at that time, and God judged them for turning from Him.
i)
In
these verses we get introduced to the next "bad egg" of this story. His name is Hoshea.
No it is not the same Hoshea as author of
"Hoshea" in the Old Testament. Like the name Zechariah, there was more than one
Hoshea. The
point is besides the biblical prophet of that name, there was also a king of
the Northern Kingdom named Hoshea, who like all the kings of the North, was
another bad egg.
ii)
The good news of the
moment is we're done reading of king after king who did turn from God in the
Northern Kingdom. The
bad news is God's judgment will now continue in the Southern Kingdom with more
"bad eggs" on the horizon.
16.
Verse
32: In
the second year of Pekah son of Remaliah king of Israel, Jotham son of Uzziah
king of Judah began to reign. 33 He was twenty-five years old when he became king, and
he reigned in Jerusalem sixteen years. His mother's name was Jerusha daughter
of Zadok. 34 He did what was right in the eyes of the LORD, just
as his father Uzziah had done. 35 The high places, however, were not removed; the
people continued to offer sacrifices and burn incense there. Jotham rebuilt the
Upper Gate of the temple of the LORD. 36 As for
the other events of Jotham's reign, and what he did, are they not written in
the book of the annals of the kings of Judah? 37 (In
those days the LORD began to send Rezin king of Aram and Pekah son of Remaliah
against Judah.) 38 Jotham rested with his fathers and was buried with
them in the City of David, the city of his father. And Ahaz his son succeeded
him as king.
a)
The focus of our story
now moves back to the Southern Kingdom. As usual by now, time is marked by the opposite
kingdom. When
the "bad egg" Pekah was in his second year, we get a new king of
Judah named Jotham. This
new king of the South gets 16 years as a king. The text simply says in effect, that he reigned
sixteen years, but he was guilty of the same sin as his father in that he
allowed the people who lived in the Southern Kingdom to worship God any old way
they felt like it.
b)
Stop and think about our
modern political leaders. How
would you feel if our current president told us how we are to worship God?
Would we obey or rebel?
One has to get the idea that living under
a king is different than living under a president or congress.
In effect living under a king means doing
what that king says, period. My point is that God wanted the kings to set a good
example of their people. I
suspect that if the king took the worship of God seriously, people would
follow. The
fact that king after king in the South let people worship God any old way they
want to, led to that nation's downfall.
c)
With that said, it may
help to remember a political line that applies well to Christians.
It goes, "We are not Democrats or
Republicans, we are theocrats". That just means that it is our desire to live under a
king with Jesus as our king. The key to living the Christian life is to remember
that Jesus rules over our lives and literally will return one day to rule over
the world. The
practical aspect here for us is simply that if we do believe Jesus is God, we
should live like we believe it. Therefore we don't "offer sacrifices in a way God
would not approve of" such as only caring about ourselves and not trying
to make a difference in the world around us in His name.
d)
This leads back to these
verses. The
text gives a quick mention to the fact that this latest king in the South did
rule for 16 years, but the key point is "Like father, like son".
That just means he was a good king but
still had the same faults as his father. Did that king do a lot more in those 16 years?
I'm sure of it.
Remember that we are reading a
"report card" on each of these kings and seeing their lives from
God's perspective. That
is why what he did is listed so briefly here as to say in effect,
"Generally a good king, but he still messed up the same way his father did
and both facts are noted by God here."
e)
In the meantime, we are
about to get a more detailed judgment on the next king of the Southern Kingdom
as his son named Ahaz takes over.
17.
Chapter 16, Verse 1:
In the seventeenth year of Pekah son of
Remaliah, Ahaz son of Jotham king of Judah began to reign. 2 Ahaz was
twenty years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem sixteen
years. Unlike David his father, he did not do what was right in the eyes of the
LORD his God. 3 He walked in the ways of the kings of Israel and even
sacrificed his son in the fire, following the detestable ways of the nations
the LORD had driven out before the Israelites. 4He offered
sacrifices and burned incense at the high places, on the hilltops and under
every spreading tree.
a)
One of the secrets to
understanding why the text is written the way it is, is to compare and contrast
the different kings and their stories. To put it simply, the latest king named Ahaz ruled the
same length of time (16 years) as his father. However while his father was considered a "good
egg", Ahaz was a bad one and he gets a more detailed judgment here.
b)
Before I get into my what's
wrong with this king speech, it may help to consider how God wanted a
relationship with the Nation of Israel and how He wants a relationship with us.
God says to Israel in effect, "You
trust in Me alone and obey My rules, and then I promise to protect and guide
your lives for My glory". When all of Israel (either or both nations) failed to
do that, God allows disasters in order to get their attention back on Him
again.
i)
This leads me back to
the tough subject of how God judges us. Not eternally, but about our witness for Him.
To trust in Jesus over our lives is in
effect, to put Him in charge as our king. That doesn't mean we can be lazy and ignore our lives.
It just means we are trusting that God is
watching over us and is in effect judging how we live.
Are we living as He desires we live or
are we just doing the "Sunday thing" and ignoring Him the rest of the
week?
c)
With that guilt ridden
speech out of my system, back to the king of the moment down in the Southern
Kingdom who is another bad egg. The text here says that he lived like one of the bad
kings in the Northern Kingdom and worshipped God "any old way he wanted
to". What
was worse is that he sacrificed his son in the fire.
i)
I
need to explain that one a little better. When the
Israelites first entered the land that they lived in, God gave them the
explicit instructions to kill all of the people living in that land. No it is a not kill everyone judgment, just the specific groups that
lived in Israel at that time. The reason being is that those
"Canaanites" lived in a way that would disgust most people today. They offered up their own kids to their gods to prove their loyalty to
them and to put it cleanly, I'm barely scratched the surface of their deviant
sexual practices. Let's just say it included sodomy
and even sexual practices with animals. I've read an
archeologist studying this group that said in effect, "Why did God wait so
long to wipe them out?"
ii)
My
point here is the current king of Judah not only acted like those who lived in
that kingdom by offering sacrifices to God "any old way he wanted
to", but this king also started to do what the Canaanites did many
hundreds of years earlier.
a)
God's
response is going to be in effect, "If you think I was hard on those
Canaanites who lived here hundreds of years earlier, what makes you the current
king think I'm going to treat you any better?"
b)
The
message for us is simply that God expects obedience and there is a price to be
paid in this lifetime when we claim to be serving Him and turn away from that
act. Remember the difference between sin and hypocrisy: To sin is to realize, here is God's standard and I've violated that
standard at this moment. Hypocrisy is to think, "I
expect you to live by this standard, but not me." That's why Jesus criticized some of the Jewish leadership in that they
had a holier than thou attitude over everyone else.
iii)
I
mention that here as I suspect the king was thinking, "I'm the king and no
one can stop me from doing what I want" and what is God or anyone living
here going to do about it? The answer is we'll find out in
the next few verses.
18.
Verse
5: Then
Rezin king of Aram and Pekah son of Remaliah king of Israel marched up to fight
against Jerusalem and besieged Ahaz, but they could not overpower him. 6 At that
time, Rezin king of Aram recovered Elath for Aram by driving out the men of
Judah. Edomites then moved into Elath and have lived there to this day.
a)
To summarize a lot of
ancient history, the Southern Kingdom started to lose territory and lives to
both the Northern Kingdom and two other traditional enemies of Israel.
The idea is to connect the personal
disobedience of the latest Southern King with the tragedies that occurred in
that kingdom at that time. If you want a good reason why we should pray for our
political leaders (especially the one's we didn't vote for) is at the least it
can affect our own lives by God saying "I've had enough rebellion of this
leader. It's
time for Me to do something drastic (like foreigners invading the land) to get
them to pay attention to Me."
19.
Verse
7: Ahaz
sent messengers to say to Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria, "I am your
servant and vassal. Come up and save me out of the hand of the king of Aram and
of the king of Israel, who are attacking me." 8 And Ahaz
took the silver and gold found in the temple of the LORD and in the treasuries
of the royal palace and sent it as a gift to the king of Assyria. 9 The king
of Assyria complied by attacking Damascus and capturing it. He deported its
inhabitants to Kir and put Rezin to death.
a)
Unfortunately the king
didn't turn to God when the trouble started but turned to the king of the
growing power of that region the Assyrian king. The king of Judah essentially said, "Hey bail me
out. I'm still a rich king
in that there is a lot of silver and gold in the temple that is dedicated to
God and I'll give you that gold and silver if you bail me out here and attack
those who are attacking me."
b)
It's sort of amazing to
look how far Israel as a combined nation has fallen in the 200 year period
since Solomon was king. When
Solomon ruled, gold and silver became worthless as there was so much of it.
The nation of Israel sought God under
David and God blessed that nation. Now after a whole bunch of bad kings in both the North
and the South we've gotten to a point where the latest king says, "Let me
rob God's temple to pay you off." A good way to tell you've sunk low is when you start
robbing priests to bribe others."
c)
In the meantime, the
king of Assyria effectively said, "We'll take your money and spare your
country." Therefore
the Assyrian king attacked Damascus (in Syria) as opposed to attacking the
Kingdom of Judah. But
John, isn't that good news for the Israelites? God spared that country by having this powerful larger
force attack someone else? To state the obvious, one can't turn their back on
the true God and get away with it. This king is now messing with his eternal salvation
let alone his witness as a king over God's people.
To summarize the rest of the chapter,
let's just say things go downhill from here for this guy.
20.
Verse 10:
Then King Ahaz went to Damascus to meet
Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria. He saw an altar in Damascus and sent to Uriah
the priest a sketch of the altar, with detailed plans for its construction. 11 So Uriah
the priest built an altar in accordance with all the plans that King Ahaz had
sent from Damascus and finished it before King Ahaz returned. 12 When the
king came back from Damascus and saw the altar, he approached it and presented
offerings on it. 13 He offered up his burnt offering and grain offering,
poured out his drink offering, and sprinkled the blood of his fellowship
offerings on the altar. 14 The bronze altar that stood before the LORD he
brought from the front of the temple--from between the new altar and the temple
of the LORD--and put it on the north side of the new altar.
a)
Let me summarize the bad
details here and then explain why we should care. The king of Judah was so impressed by the power of the
Assyrians, that the king of Judah ordered an altar of the god that the
Assyrians worshipped be made just like it in Jerusalem.
It's like saying, "Wow, you guys are
powerful and your god is obviously blessing you right now, so let me copy what
you do and worship that way when I get back home."
i)
To me, the amazing thing
to read about the history of the kingdoms of Israel and the Southern Kingdom of
Judah is not that their kingdom came to an end; it is the fact that God waited
as long as He did to wipe them out. When you read stories like this how the Israelites
literally turned their back on God, it is amazing to think about the fact God
wasn't tougher on them than He already was. It shows that He is always reaching out to those He
loves despite the sins we commit. It makes me appreciate all the more the mercy He shows
for you and me reading these stories.
b)
To state what will
become obvious, God is going to show His superiority over all other so called
gods that exist at that time. To put that in our vocabulary, God does not want to be
#1 on a list of 10 things that are important to us, He wants to be #1 on a list
of 1. That just means He
wants to be in charge of all aspects of our lives and we should care about our
behavior in all we do. OK,
enough judgment on us. Back
to the bad king of the moment in the Southern Kingdom of Israel.
21.
Verse 15:
King Ahaz then gave these orders to Uriah
the priest: "On the large new altar, offer the morning burnt offering and
the evening grain offering, the king's burnt offering and his grain offering,
and the burnt offering of all the people of the land, and their grain offering
and their drink offering. Sprinkle on the altar all the blood of the burnt
offerings and sacrifices. But I will use the bronze altar for seeking
guidance." 16 And Uriah the priest did just as King Ahaz had
ordered.
a)
To put it simply, things
are continuing to go downhill for this king. He now orders that the daily offerings to God as
required in the Jewish law now be made on this new altar dedicated to the
Assyrian god. In
fact the king then announced that he'll use this altar to seek guidance.
Talk about trying to worship God
"any old way we feel like it", here is the king of Judah, purposely
ignoring God's requirements of how He is to be worshipped and ordering the top
priest to use this Assyrian god's altar for sacrifices and guidance.
b)
So why did the priest
cooperate? He
feared the king's wrath more than God. With that said, we're not done going downhill of
turning away from God. It
gets even worse in the next few verses.
22.
Verse
17: King
Ahaz took away the side panels and removed the basins from the movable stands.
He removed the Sea from the bronze bulls that supported it and set it on a
stone base. 18He took away the Sabbath canopy that had been built at
the temple and removed the royal entryway outside the temple of the LORD, in
deference to the king of Assyria.
a)
To understand these
verses, we have to go back to the time of King Solomon.
Among the things he made to worship God
were portable washing basins to help the priests clean the sacrifices that were
made. Besides the portable
washing basins, there was also a large tub used for ritual bathing.
The current king who was a descendant of
Solomon, removed the statues of bulls that supported this bathing basin.
i)
Here is where that is
significant. There
were 12 of those bull statutes made under the guidance of King Solomon.
The idea was to show that the priests
working in God's Temple were to help the 12 tribes of Israel draw closer to
God. By the king of the
moment removing those 12 statues, it sent a symbolic message to Israelites
living in the Southern Kingdom that they are no longer seeking God but are now
seeking this Assyrian god for protection. As to the washing basin, it now rested on a stone
slab. This is showing how
God is now getting "second fiddle" to the new temple built to this
Assyrian god.
ii)
The text also mentions a
canopy. This
is a covered that led from the king's house to the temple.
It was not an "official" canopy
but just a way of saying the king is a special person and we've covered the way
for him to travel from where he lived to where the temple was located.
The point being that the current king
wanted to honor the Assyrian god, so the canopy was moved so the king could
bypass God's temple and walk to the altar that he cared about.
b)
OK John, we get the idea
this is a bad king and he is probably in hell now as he decided to turn from
God with his life. These
kings lived millenniums ago. I've got my own issues to worry about.
Why should I care about a bad group of
kings that lived so long ago?
i)
Yes we get the idea that
turning from God is a bad idea and sin multiplies upon itself and people go
from bad to worse once they stop caring about being judged by God.
To be honest, this is getting old and
repetitive. We
read these lessons as we are trusting in God and care about His judgment.
So is the point here just to avoid acting
like these kings? For
starters, yes.
ii)
More importantly, it is
about keeping in mind that God wants to be in charge of every aspect of our
lives and guide them for His glory. I've had to learn over and over again, that just
trying to do the right thing doesn't work. We need to trust in His Power to do the right thing.
Further, I find that when we focus on
helping others we are less likely to fall into our old bad habits.
c)
Coming back to the king
of the moment, to put it overly simple, he really was a bad egg and a bad
example to the people living under his rule. Unfortunately when you have a bad leader, those under
that leader suffer. That
is the true tragedy of the judgment that occurs in this world.
This leads me to the final two verses in
this lesson:
23.
Verse
19: As
for the other events of the reign of Ahaz, and what he did, are they not
written in the book of the annals of the kings of Judah? 20 Ahaz
rested with his fathers and was buried with them in the City of David. And
Hezekiah his son succeeded him as king.
a)
The final set of verses
in this chapter state in effect that Ahaz eventually died and despite the sins
he did, he was still buried with his ancestors as he was a descendant of David.
b)
The good news coming up
in the next lesson is that the next king of the South is a really good king.
In fact, Chapters 18 through 20 focus on
this next king. What
I'm saying is we are now one more chapter away from getting through all of this
negative judgment talk and focusing on something positive.
c)
I'll be the first to
admit, this was a tough lesson to get through. Let's face it, there are a lot better ways to spend
our time than to read about bad kings who lived millenniums ago.
The reason this is all part of the bible
is to say to you and me, "There are consequences to turn away from God
with our lives". It
will cut short our time to live let alone face eternal consequences for our
behavior.
i)
What I want us to get
out of this lesson is not to "shake in our boots" that God will judge
us if we dare sin today. What
I do want us to get is the idea that God cares about our lives and would like
us to glorify Him in all that we do. That means we trust Him to guide us and we seek Him
for that purpose. We
remember that our time on earth is short and the best use of that time is to
make a difference for Him in whatever capacity God has called us to live in
this world. It
is to realize that His judgment is not just the eternal kind, but also judgment
on how we used the time and the opportunities God has given us in our lives.
We can't lose our salvation by sinning
too much, but we can lose opportunities to make a difference for Him and that
is what this lesson focused on. OK, end of the guilt session.
Time to close in prayer.
24.
Father, we don't know what
you have planned for the us for the rest of our lives, but we trust that You
are guiding us to make that difference for You. Help us to remember that You know all things and want
to guide us to make that difference for You. Help us to have a healthy fear of Your judgment, not
that we can lose our salvation, but that we can waste the opportunities that
You give us to make that difference for You. Guide us as we trust in Your Spirit to strengthen us
to do what it is You call of us to do. We ask this in Jesus
name, Amen.